Psychic development — encompassing its cognate formulation as ego-development — occupies a central and contested position across the depth-psychology corpus. The term names the processes by which psychic structure is progressively built, differentiated, and ultimately integrated: from the primordial undifferentiated unity of the uroboros, through the hero’s struggles for ego-autonomy, to the individuation of the second half of life. Neumann furnishes the most architecturally ambitious account, tracing ontogenetic and phylogenetic development across mythological stages; his schema, while enormously influential, attracted Giegerich’s pointed critique that archetypes do not develop and that ‘stages’ are better conceived as contemporaneous styles of consciousness. Edinger translates the ego-Self axis into a clinical grammar, reading the inflation-alienation cycle as the engine of developmental momentum. Stein, following Jung closely, articulates the first half of life as a project of ego and persona consolidation, with the second half demanding a reversal toward Self-integration. Winnicott anchors ego-development in the relational matrix of holding and maternal care. Aurobindo introduces the psychic being — a soul-personality distinct from ego — as the true agent of inner development, pointing toward a transpersonal register absent from most Western formulations. Hillman, dissenting sharply, identifies the very concept of linear development as an anachronistic Darwinian fantasy incompatible with imaginal consciousness. The field is thus structured by irreducible tensions: linear versus spiral temporality, ego-centered versus Self-centered teleology, and empirical versus archetypal foundations.