Physics occupies a singular position in the depth-psychology corpus: it functions not merely as a natural science but as an epistemological mirror in which psychologists, philosophers, and physicists alike seek confirmation of their deepest intuitions about the structure of reality. The corpus divides broadly into three positions. First, Wolfgang Pauli — the Nobel laureate physicist who collaborated intensively with Jung — treats physics as a discipline that has outgrown the ‘detached observer’ of classical mechanics, now confronting irreducible complementarity between measurement apparatus and observed system; for Pauli, this parallels the autonomy of the unconscious. Second, Marie-Louise von Franz reads modern physics — quantum symmetry, space-time relativity, field theory — as convergent with Jungian synchronicity and with archaic cosmological intuitions, arguing that psyche and matter approach a common substrate. Third, Iain McGilchrist marshals physics to critique scientific materialism (‘physicalism’), showing that physics itself, in its pragmatist modesty and its tolerance of discontinuity and asymmetry, undermines the reductive worldview erected in its name. The tensions are productive: Does physics converge with psychology, or merely offer loose analogies? Is the ‘observer problem’ in quantum mechanics genuinely homologous to the unconscious, or a seductive metaphor? These questions drive the field’s most ambitious theoretical projects.