Phenomenology Of Inner Life

the epoché can be described as the flexible and trainable mental skill of being able both to suspend one’s inattentive immersion in experience and to turn one’s attention to the manner in which something appears or is given to experience

Thompson identifies the phenomenological epoché as a first-person disciplinary method for redirecting attention from the natural attitude toward the how of experiential givenness, making it the central operation in investigating inner life.

Thompson, Evan, Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind, 2007thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Genetic phenomenology is concerned with how these intentional structures and objects emerge through time; therefore, it cannot take them as given. Instead, it analyzes how certain types of experience motivate later and more complex types.

Thompson articulates genetic phenomenology as the account of how inner experience accrues temporal sedimentation, moving beyond static structural description to the dynamic genesis of lived experience.

Thompson, Evan, Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind, 2007thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

phenomenology, a more recent tradition, fathered by Edmund Husserl, which argues that the proper realm of the study of the human being is consciousness itself. From a phenomenological approach, understanding takes place from within; hence, we must bracket the natural world and attend instead to the inner experience that is the author of that world.

Yalom situates phenomenology as the methodological backbone of existential therapy, locating its distinctive claim in the insistence that inner experience, not external behavior, is the proper domain of psychological inquiry.

Yalom, Irvin D., The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, Fifth Edition, 2008thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the shift from static to genetic phenomenology thus marks a turn toward the lived body and time-consciousness. Thus it enables us to deepen the connection between phenomenology and the enactive approach.

Thompson argues that the transition from static to genetic phenomenology anchors inner life in embodied temporality, forging a productive convergence with enactive cognitive science.

Thompson, Evan, Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind, 2007thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Consciousness is an outside that is inside, and an inside that is outside. Normally, consciousness is ‘in’ the world and ‘with’ the things in the world. It is not ‘in’ me.

Giegerich dismantles the naive interiority assumed by phenomenological accounts of inner life, arguing that consciousness is a dialectical institution that cannot be located inside the subject as a spatial container.

Giegerich, Wolfgang, The Soul’s Logical Life Towards a Rigorous Notion of, 2020thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Psychology is the discipline of interiority. But this interiority is not in me, not in you, not in anybody, also not in the depth of any thing out there. It is in its (psychology’s) own Notion itself.

Giegerich redefines psychological interiority as the logical self-reflexivity of the soul’s Notion rather than as introspective access to personal inner states, challenging phenomenological approaches that privilege first-person access.

Giegerich, Wolfgang, The Soul’s Logical Life Towards a Rigorous Notion of, 2020thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

there is no direct encounter with immediate, lived experiencing. Instead, the relation to experience is always mediated by theoretical constructs.

Welwood identifies the mediated character of conventional therapeutic and theoretical approaches to experience, establishing the need for a more direct phenomenological or contemplative engagement with inner life.

Welwood, John, Toward a Psychology of Awakening Buddhism, Psychotherapy,, 2000thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

phenomenological reflection is an attempt to find new meaning, new understanding, new directions, meditation is a more radical path of undoing, which involves relaxing any tendency to become caught up in feelings, thoughts, and identifications.

Welwood distinguishes phenomenological reflection, which remains within the register of meaning-making, from meditative non-identification, which constitutes a more thoroughgoing dissolution of attachment to the contents of inner life.

Welwood, John, Toward a Psychology of Awakening Buddhism, Psychotherapy,, 2000supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

it could likewise be analyzed by a phenomenology of prayer linked to the fact that the Mandeans, the Sabeans of Harran, the Manicheans, the Buddhists of Central Asia take the north as the Qibla (the axis of orientation) of their prayer.

Corbin extends phenomenological method into sacred geography, showing that a phenomenology of inner life must account for the orienting structures of visionary and devotional experience in traditions outside the Western philosophical canon.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

if you look into yourselves, you will see on the other hand the nearby as far-off and infinite, since the world of the inner is as infinite as the world of the outer.

Jung asserts the ontological parity and inexhaustibility of the inner world with the outer, grounding depth psychology’s commitment to rigorous phenomenological exploration of the psyche.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Red Book: Liber Novus, 2009supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Psychology cannot be approached in the manner of external reflection without psychology ipso facto self-annihilating. Its subject matter or root-metaphor, soul, is defined as internal reflection.

Giegerich argues that the subject matter of psychology—soul—is constituted by internal reflection, so any externally observational or empirical approach to inner life destroys the very phenomenon it seeks to study.

Giegerich, Wolfgang, The Soul’s Logical Life Towards a Rigorous Notion of, 2020supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

in memory or imagination, on the other hand, the object imagined or remembered is not given as present in its very being, but rather as both phenomenally absent and as mentally evoked or called forth.

Thompson applies Husserlian distinctions between presentational and re-presentational experience to clarify how memory and imagination differ structurally from perception within the phenomenology of inner life.

Thompson, Evan, Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind, 2007supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

One common thread running through the following chapters is a reliance on the philosophical tradition of phenomenology, inaugurated by Edmund Husserl and developed in various directions by numerous others, most notably for my purposes by Maurice Merleau-Ponty.

Thompson situates his project within the Husserlian phenomenological tradition, particularly as extended by Merleau-Ponty, to ground an integrated scientific and philosophical account of mind and inner life.

Thompson, Evan, Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind, 2007supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Associated experiences reciprocally strengthen and reinforce each other and thereby give rise to new formations that supersede their prior separateness. Association also involves the retention and anticipation of sense or meaning.

Thompson explains how passive synthesis and association in Husserl’s genetic phenomenology account for the temporal layering and motivational structure of inner experiential life.

Thompson, Evan, Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind, 2007supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Until now, the application of purely intellectual analysis to the understanding of the inner world of experience has not been able to prove or disprove any-thing about the ultimate philosophical or religious questions of life which form the foundation of anyone’s psychological structure.

Arroyo contends that purely analytical methods are inadequate to inner life because meaning arises from within rather than from external conceptual frameworks, aligning with phenomenological critiques of objectivism.

Stephen Arroyo, Astrology, Psychology, and the Four Elements: An Energy Approach to Astrology and Its Use in the Counseling Arts, 1975supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

it was the vibrating of the rich, fluid life of the soul, not in the medium of empirical time, but in the soul’s native medium of thought.

Giegerich distinguishes the soul’s inner life as occurring within the medium of thought rather than empirical or clock time, complicating phenomenological accounts that anchor temporality in lived bodily experience.

Giegerich, Wolfgang, The Soul’s Logical Life Towards a Rigorous Notion of, 2020aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

in reverie, we are in that middle place between waking and dreaming, and, in that landscape, the borders and edges of a work become less rigid and distinct.

Romanyshyn invokes reverie as a liminal mode of access to the inner life of a research process, gesturing toward a phenomenology of the imaginal that resists both purely rational and purely oneiric registers.

Romanyshyn, Robert D., The Wounded Researcher: Research with Soul in Mind, 2007aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →