Persecution in the depth-psychology corpus occupies a markedly heterogeneous conceptual space. At the explicitly psychological register, von Franz identifies persecution ideation as the characteristic pathology of the inferior function: when split-off psychic material cannot be integrated, it returns as a persecutory fantasy, a formulation with direct clinical implications. The early Freudian tradition, indexed through Abraham’s bibliography, situates the ‘feeling of persecution’ within object-relational dynamics, linking it to masculine protest and the fate of libidinal investment. Klein’s work on primal envy and idealization operates as an adjacent theoretical frame, even where persecution anxiety is not named directly. At the historical-religious register, the corpus is dense with persecution as social and political fact: Hadot records Marcus Aurelius’s politically motivated persecution of Christians; Thielman surveys the experience of marginalized early Christian communities for whom persecution was simultaneously theological datum and pastoral emergency, generating sophisticated theologies of endurance, eschatological vindication, and faith as fire-tested gold. Tarnas situates Inquisition persecution within Saturn-Pluto archetypal cycles, translating historical violence into a cosmological grammar. Jung’s index notation — ‘persecution by dead parents’ — points toward the intrapsychic dimension, where the term migrates from social fact to internal structure. The field thus holds persecution as outer violence, inner dynamic, and archetypal recurrence simultaneously.