Perfection occupies a tensional, productive centre in the depth-psychology corpus. The literature refuses any simple equation of the term with moral flawlessness or achieved completion; instead, it stages a sustained confrontation between perfection as a spiritual telos, a psychological compulsion, and a metaphysical category. Jung, in the Red Book, treats perfection as paradox: it is simultaneously poverty, sacrifice, solitude, and community, an end that is always also a beginning, never a static possession. Edinger, drawing on Jung’s Answer to Job, sharpens this into a structural opposition: masculine striving for perfection against the feminine principle of completeness, arguing that overemphasis on the former produces a dangerous one-sidedness demanding correction. Woodman transforms this structural insight into clinical diagnosis: perfectionism as patriarchal addiction, a compulsive self-fashioning that dissociates body from spirit and culminates in eating disorders and psychological rigidity. Orthodox spirituality, through Coniaris, reframes the scriptural injunction itself, arguing that the Greek future tense promises perfection as ongoing theosis rather than demanding present achievement. Sri Aurobindo situates perfection within an integral yoga—a collective as well as individual ascent from mental to supramental nature. Cassian poses the question of whether perfection is ever realizable within a single life. Together these voices refuse resolution: perfection in this corpus is simultaneously imperative, impossible, dangerous when literalized, and indispensable as orienting aspiration.