Within the depth-psychology corpus, 'paper' appears not as a unified theoretical concept but as a term whose significance ranges across several distinct registers. Most prominently, it designates the material substrate that made the card-divination tradition possible: historians of Tarot such as Place, Greer, and Jodorowsky treat paper's Chinese invention and slow westward diffusion as the enabling condition for the emergence of printed cards and, ultimately, the Tarot as a psychological instrument. Seaford, approaching from the philosophy of money, identifies paper as the paradigm case of pure token money — valuable only through imposed sign, not inherent worth — a formulation that resonates with depth-psychological reflections on symbolic versus literal value. Easwaran extends this semiotic logic into the language of shraddha, arguing that paper currency functions through collective faith in a shared symbol, making the collapse of monetary trust analogous to the collapse of spiritual conviction. A third register, less symbolically charged but methodologically significant, is the scholarly paper as a vehicle of theoretical transmission: Klein's editorial apparatus, Hogenson's evolutionary-psychology argument, Stein's commentary on Jung's 'Review of the Complex Theory,' and Pauli's physics papers all invoke 'paper' in this sense. McGilchrist uses the term descriptively in art-historical captions. The term thus maps a trajectory from material substrate to semiotic token to institutional genre — each register touching questions of symbol, sign, and the transmission of meaning that lie at the heart of depth-psychological inquiry.
In the library
12 passages
where an artefact can be so easily produced that it is of small inherent value, such as paper, it can become money only by the imposition of a sign. And indeed paper is an especially convenient form of token money.
Seaford identifies paper as the archetypal token money whose value is entirely constituted by an imposed sign rather than intrinsic worth, making it the limit-case for understanding the relationship between symbol and substance in monetary systems.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004thesis
the grocer accepts that paper out of shraddha. He believes and trusts that the paper has a particular value; and because of that belief, he not only gives away a loaf of bread for it but gives away his time, his energy
Easwaran uses paper currency as the central illustration of shraddha — collective, deep-rooted faith — arguing that the entire monetary and social order rests on shared symbolic conviction rather than literal value.
Easwaran, Eknath, The Bhagavad Gita for Daily Living: A Verse-by-Verse Commentary, 1975thesis
To find the origin of cards in general we must look to China because this is where paper was invented. In the second century C.E., the Chinese began to make a pulp from the bark of the mulberry tree and press and dry it into thin sheets.
Place establishes paper's Chinese invention as the material precondition for the entire card and Tarot tradition, situating the psychological instrument of divination within a specific history of material culture.
Place, Robert M., The Tarot: History, Symbolism, and Divination, 2005thesis
In the twelfth century, Islamic culture supplied the missing element, paper, and the craft of making it. In the fourteenth century paper cards were introduced to Europe, most likely in Spain or Sicily where Muslim and Christian culture intermingled.
Place traces the transmission of papermaking into Europe as the necessary precondition for the manufacture of playing and Tarot cards, framing the emergence of symbolic card culture as dependent on this material transfer.
Place, Robert M., The Tarot: History, Symbolism, and Divination, 2005supporting
Aided by the fortuitous influx of papermaking techniques in the 11th through 13th centuries and woodblock printing prior to the end of the 14th, cards soon appeared all over Europe.
Greer situates papermaking techniques alongside woodblock printing as the twin material technologies that enabled the rapid dissemination of symbolic playing cards across Europe.
Greer, Mary K., Tarot for Your Self: A Workbook for the Inward Journey, 1984supporting
This paper considers the claim that C. G. Jung used a Lamarckian model of evolution to underwrite his theory of archetypes. This claim is challenged on the basis of Jung's familiarity with and use of the writings of James Mark Baldwin
Hogenson's use of 'this paper' signals the scholarly-article genre as a vehicle for revising received interpretations of Jung's evolutionary epistemology, here challenging the Lamarckian attribution of archetype theory.
Hogenson, George, The Baldwin Effect: A Neglected Influence on C. G. Jungs Evolutionary Thinking, 2001supporting
Her views were represented by four papers; one given by herself on 'The Emotional Life and Ego Development of the Infant with Special Reference to the Depressive Position', and three others given by two colleagues
Klein's editorial apparatus deploys 'paper' as the institutional unit through which theoretical controversies in psychoanalysis were formally contested and transmitted during the 1943–44 Controversial Discussions.
Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957supporting
In 1946 she described in detail the many splitting mechanisms by which the ego defends itself against persecutory anxiety, and which form the basis of the dissociated and disintegrated condition of the schizophrenic.
The editorial gloss tracks Klein's successive papers as stages in the progressive articulation of splitting, projective identification, and the paranoid-schizoid position — demonstrating how the paper-genre structures psychoanalytic theory-building.
Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957supporting
His paper, 'A Review of the Complex Theory,' published in 1934, offers an excellent summary. Written long after his break with Freud, Jung makes some highly complimentary references to his former teacher
Stein identifies Jung's 1934 paper as the canonical retrospective summary of complex theory, illustrating how the scholarly paper functions as a site of theoretical consolidation and autobiographical reflection within analytical psychology.
Stein, Murray, Jung's Map of the Soul: An Introduction, 1998supporting
Sometimes a client will say, 'Can't I do this?' and throw the paper onto the floor. The therapist would reply by summarizing some of the main avoidance strategies … 'this (mimes throwing the paper away) is basically the same thing as this (mimes pushing the paper away).'
Harris uses a physical sheet of paper as a psychotherapeutic prop in ACT defusion work, making the object a concrete metaphor for the client's relationship to unwanted thoughts and feelings.
Harris, Russ, ACT Made Simple: An Easy-To-Read Primer on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, 2009aside
it is not even the impact factor of the researcher's paper that is counted, but that of the journal in which it was published. The actual paper may prove to have been a waste of many people's time, but it will still count favourably
McGilchrist critiques the impact-factor system as a bureaucratic distortion that severs the scholarly paper from its actual intellectual merit, subordinating genuine inquiry to institutional metrics.
McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021aside
This paper, together with one by Dr Phyllis Greenacre on the same theme, was the subject of a discussion at the 22nd International Psycho-Analytical Congress at Edinburgh, 1961.
Winnicott's footnote marks his paper on the holding environment as a formally presented and debated contribution at an international congress, locating theory-formation within the institutional life of psychoanalysis.
Winnicott, Donald, The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment, 1965aside