Oxytocin occupies a pivotal position in the depth-psychology corpus as the neurochemical substrate of social bonding, attachment, and what Damasio aptly names the ‘legendary elixir’ of relational life. The literature approaches the peptide from at least four distinct angles. First, evolutionary neuroscience — represented most thoroughly by Porges and Panksepp — situates oxytocin within an ancient molecular lineage shared with vasopressin and vasotocin, emphasizing its role in the mammalian transition from reptilian defensive physiology to prosocial engagement. Second, affective neuroscience — Panksepp above all — maps oxytocin’s bidirectional involvement in sexuality (arousal, orgasm, refractory period) and maternal nurturance, demonstrating that the same peptide can simultaneously facilitate and satiate desire. Third, attachment theory’s neuroscientific wing, represented by Levine and Lench, foregrounds oxytocin as the hormonal correlate of trust, cooperation, and pair-bond formation, linking receptor-gene variation to individual differences in relational style. Fourth, clinical and psychoeducational voices such as Burnett frame oxytocin as the reinforcing engine of selective emotional attachment — the neurochemical explanation for why we love some and not others. Tensions persist around blood-brain barrier penetration, dose-dependency effects on social memory, and whether oxytocin’s benefits emerge primarily under conditions of stress and adversity, as Porges insists.