Overman

Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Overman’ (Übermensch, rendered also as ‘Superman’) occupies a contested position: it is simultaneously Nietzsche’s most provocative philosophical coinage and the concept most systematically misread, a misreading Nietzsche himself catalogued with bitter precision. The primary Nietzschean sources establish the Overman as the antithesis of the ‘modern,’ the ‘good,’ and the Christian — a type of supreme self-overcoming grounded in will to power rather than in idealist transcendence or saintly renunciation. Jung, engaging Nietzsche’s Zarathustra at length, reframes the Overman through depth-psychological categories: he reads the figure as symptomatic of psychic inflation, the consequence of Nietzsche’s identification with archetypal contents — old man, self, anima — that overwhelmed the personal ego. For Jung, the Overman ideal is inseparable from Nietzsche’s shadow problem: the repudiation of the ordinary person and the collective constitutes a pathological one-sidedness. Ricoeur, approaching obliquely, notes the epistemological dilemma the concept generates: if Nietzsche’s perspectivism is universal, the Overman’s proclamation cannot escape the sophism of the liar. Hollis and Hillman, while not addressing the term directly, orbit its themes of self-overcoming and exceptional human capacity. The tension between the concept as Nietzsche intended it and the concept as psychologically dangerous inflation defines the term’s significance in this corpus.

In the library 11 passages

The word “overman,” as the designation of a type of supreme achievement, as opposed to “modern” men, to “good” men, to Christians and other nihilists — a word that in the mouth of a Zarathustra, the annihilator of morality, becomes a very pensive word

Nietzsche insists that ‘overman’ names a type of supreme human achievement defined negatively against modernity, goodness, and Christianity, and protests that it has been universally misconstrued as an idealistic or saintly ideal.

Nietzsche, Friedrich, On the Genealogy of Morals, 1887thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

I teach you the Superman: he is this lightning, he is this madness! … Man is a rope, fastened between animal and Superman — a rope over an abyss. A dangerous going-across, a dangerous wayfaring

Zarathustra presents the Superman as the goal that gives human existence its meaning and danger, positioning mankind as a transitional being rather than an end in itself.

Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, 1883thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

I teach you the Superman. Man is something that should be overcome. And: The Superman is the meaning of the earth. Let your will say: The Superman shall be the meaning of the earth.

The foundational proclamation of the Overman in Zarathustra establishes self-overcoming and earthly affirmation — rather than otherworldly transcendence — as the core of the concept.

Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, 1883thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

When the same thing happens in an individual, when he imposes commands upon himself, and obeys them, so that he too as it were changes from a rabble into a nation, the result is ‘the Superman’, the man who is master of himself.

The editorial introduction to Zarathustra reads the Superman as the culmination of sublimated will to power — the individual who achieves sovereign self-command through internalized discipline.

Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, 1883thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

inasmuch as he considers that he is the Übermensch himself, nobody can surpass him or leap over him: everybody has to consider him. He must be considered and he has to consider nobody because they only deserve to be overleapt.

Jung diagnoses Nietzsche’s identification with the Übermensch ideal as a form of psychic inflation that logically entails the contemptuous exclusion of all other persons from moral consideration.

Jung, C.G., Nietzsche’s Zarathustra: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1934-1939, 1988thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

he feels himself to be a mere instrument, a suffering body into which these powers have descended. So an inflation is what the word denotes; the body is filled with gas and becomes too light and rises too high

Jung interprets Nietzsche’s condition as archetypal possession — an inflation in which the ego is overwhelmed by the self, old-man, and anima complexes — the psychological substrate of the Overman identification.

Jung, C.G., Nietzsche’s Zarathustra: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1934-1939, 1988supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

how can one justify the tone of revelation with which the will to power, the overman, and the eternal return of the same are proclaimed? This dilemma, which does not seem to have kept Nietzsche from thinking and writing, has become that of his commentators

Ricoeur identifies the self-referential contradiction embedded in Nietzsche’s proclamatory style: if universal perspectivism holds, the Overman’s announcement cannot claim exemption from the reign of appearance.

Ricoeur, Paul, Oneself as Another, 1992supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The self-overcoming of morality, out of truthfulness; the self-overcoming of the moralist, into his opposite — into me — that is what the name of Zarathustra means in my mouth.

Nietzsche grounds the Overman concept in a radical self-overcoming of morality itself, positioning truthfulness — not conventional virtue — as the supreme value that motivates the Zarathustran transformation.

Nietzsche, Friedrich, On the Genealogy of Morals, 1887supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

I have followed the living creature, I have followed the greatest and the smallest paths, that I might understand its nature… wherever I found living creatures, there too I heard the language of obedience.

Zarathustra’s doctrine of self-overcoming is grounded in an observation of life itself as will to power, providing the naturalistic basis upon which the Overman ideal rests.

Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, 1883supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

All creators are hard … Wagner he counted one of the greatest exemplars of artistic creativity, but unfortunately there was in him a streak of decadence, a softness, a romantic weakness

The introduction contextualizes Nietzsche’s creative ideal — the hardness and discipline underlying the Overman — against his disillusionment with Wagner as a failed exemplar of that standard.

Jung, C.G., Nietzsche’s Zarathustra: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1934-1939, 1988aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms