Within the depth-psychology corpus, Odin functions as a remarkably overdetermined figure: simultaneously shamanic initiate, god of ecstatic fury, lord of the dead, patron of poetry and runic wisdom, and — in Jung’s hands — a living autonomous archetype capable of possessing a collective. Eliade’s treatment is primarily comparative-religious, situating Odin among Indo-European parallels to Siberian shamanism: the hanging on Yggdrasil, necromantic descent to Hel, and the corps of wolfish Valkyries each carry structural resonance with shamanic initiation. Campbell reads the Yggdrasil sacrifice in explicit parallel with the Buddha’s Bodhi-tree illumination and the Christian cross, foregrounding the self-sacrificial grammar of the mythologem. Jung’s most consequential contribution lies in his identification of Wotan/Odin not merely as a historical deity but as a Germanic psychological archetype — a force of wind, rage, mantic inspiration, and wandering — that irrupts historically through collective possession. Neumann locates Odin within a matriarchal context, stressing his derivation of wisdom from the völva and from Mimir’s well, while Bly reads the mercurial-Odinic energy as an interior nervous principle shared across Hermes, Mercury, and Wotan. Benveniste grounds the name etymologically in the Proto-Germanic root for ‘fury,’ linking the Wild Hunt to Wotan-Odin as leader of the dead. The central tension across the corpus is between Odin as shamanic technician of ecstasy and Odin as autonomous transpersonal archetype — between ethnographic function and psychodynamic force.