The oak occupies a remarkably dense symbolic position within the depth-psychology corpus, drawing together strands of alchemy, mythology, individuation theory, and archaic religion into a coherent, if multi-valenced, cluster of meaning. Jung identifies the oak most pointedly as a symbol of the Self — ‘the prototype of the self, a symbol of the source and goal of the individuation process’ — and reads its appearance in fairy tales as the marker of a central, kingly content within the unconscious. Abraham’s alchemical lexicon adds a parallel technical register: the hollow oak figures as both the philosophical tree and the alchemical vessel, a container for the mercurial water around which the work turns. Jung’s Mysterium Coniunctionis pursues this further through the Cadmus myth, where the hollow oak into which the serpent is spitted becomes a locus of coniunctio symbolism. Hillman’s acorn theory in The Soul’s Code inverts the directional logic: the oak is not merely the terminus of individuation but its telos already inscribed in the seed, and the oak’s ancient sacred status — as soul tree, site of nymphs, diviners, and oracular speech — underwrites his daimon mythology. Hillman further recovers the oak’s classical religious dignity: its foreknowledge, its connection of above and below, its function as vehicle for the invisible. Benveniste’s etymological work on the Indo-European root dreu-/doru- grounds these symbolic readings in the deep linguistic kinship between ‘tree,’ ‘wood,’ and ‘trust.’ What emerges is a term inseparable from questions of selfhood, containment, sacred knowledge, and the telos of psychic life.