Negativity

we live in a time that is poor in negativity. And so, the neuronal illnesses of the twenty-first century follow a dialectic: not the dialectic of negativity, but that of positivity. They are pathological conditions deriving from an excess of positivity.

Han argues that the pathologies of contemporary society — depression, burnout — result not from an excess of negativity but from its systematic elimination, positing the dialectic of negativity as the condition of psychic health.

Han, Byung-Chul, The Burnout Society, 2010thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

The all-surrounding wilderness… is the still positive image of the logical negativity of the soul… Artemis is the inner secret of this negativity, a secret through which negativity is absolute and not just an ordinary, simple negation.

Giegerich distinguishes absolute logical negativity — the soul's self-constituting movement — from mere ordinary negation, using the figure of Artemis as the positive face that only appears when negativity becomes fully absolute and self-referential.

Giegerich, Wolfgang, The Soul’s Logical Life Towards a Rigorous Notion of, 2020thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

a real turn to the Other presupposes the negativity of an interruption. Only by the negative means of making-pause [Innehalten] can the subject of action thoroughly measure the sphere of co

Han argues that genuine encounter with alterity and the possibility of sovereign action require the structural negativity of pause and interruption, which hyperactive positivity systematically forecloses.

Han, Byung-Chul, The Burnout Society, 2010thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Disciplinary society is still governed by no. Its negativity produces madmen and criminals. In contrast, achievement society creates depressives and losers… the negativity of prohibition impedes further expansion.

Han maps the historical shift from disciplinary to achievement society as a transition from governing by negativity (prohibition, the 'No') to positivity (the 'Can'), with distinct pathological consequences for each regime.

Han, Byung-Chul, The Burnout Society, 2010thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

the difference between positivity and negativity is now of categorial significance. Positivity and negativity are no longer ontologized 'regions' or 'realms' of reality, but two logical statuses or forms in which everything… can be seen and comprehended.

Giegerich elevates the positivity/negativity distinction to the fundamental logical-categorial axis of soul-psychology, superseding earlier ontological polarities such as matter versus spirit.

Giegerich, Wolfgang, The Soul’s Logical Life Towards a Rigorous Notion of, 2020thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Meister Eckhart says that God negates negation… God as negatio negationis is simultaneously total emptiness and supreme fullness.

McGilchrist presents the mystical-theological tradition of negatio negationis — the negation of negation as the ground of Being — as converging with Kabbalistic, Buddhist, and Taoist accounts of generative emptiness.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

'Keter's very negativity is what brings all of the succeeding sefirot into being. This negativity is, in fact, the essential manifestation of the primal will.'

Drawing on Lurianic Kabbalah, McGilchrist identifies cosmogonic negativity — the primal withdrawal — as the condition of creation, aligning it with the brain's creative reciprocal inhibition and Heidegger's 'das Nichts selbst nichtet.'

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

'Keter's very negativity is what brings all of the succeeding sefirot into being. This negativity is, in fact, the essential manifestation of the primal will.'

Duplicate passage affirming that primordial negativity in the Kabbalistic framework is the active generative principle underlying all emanation and creation.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Negative senex is the same kind of epithet… because the negative senex is not an ego fault it cannot be altered by the ego… it reflects a prior disorder in the archetypal ground of the ego.

Hillman critiques the Jungian convention of 'negative' archetype-labeling, arguing that archetypal negativity is not an ego-level moral defect but a structural condition rooted in the archetypal ground itself.

Hillman, James, Senex & Puer, 2015thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Upon the principle of negation rest all the judgments of positive and negative in whatever sphere—moral, aesthetic, psychological… Negation, according to Freud, is repression: 'A negative judgment is the intellectual substitute for repression.'

Hillman, via Freud, locates negation as the senex-inflected cognitive operation that functions as repression's intellectual substitute, undergirding all positive/negative moral and psychological judgments.

Hillman, James, Senex & Puer, 2015thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

What I am talking about is the accomplished negation… a negation that goes all the way and therefore does not even stop at negating itself (in the sense of a 'negation of the negation' [HEGEL]).

Giegerich develops Hegel's negation of the negation as the model for psychological self-transformation: an 'accomplished negation' that does not rest in undialectical subversion but completes itself by turning against itself.

Giegerich, Wolfgang, The Soul’s Logical Life Towards a Rigorous Notion of, 2020supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Both options of his alternative are already on the positive side of the real alternative between positivity or negativity of the truth concept. The unending search for truth is just as positive as the idea of possessing the truth about life.

Giegerich argues that the positivity/negativity distinction in the concept of truth supersedes the conventional opposition between dogmatic possession and open-ended seeking, both of which remain on the positive side of the real logical divide.

Giegerich, Wolfgang, The Soul’s Logical Life Towards a Rigorous Notion of, 2020supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

The absolute-negative is in itself negative and that is to say 'towards' itself negative; it is something positive that as such is its own self-negation… it is in itself negative throughout.

Giegerich explicates the structure of absolute negativity as inherent self-negation — not a negation requiring an external other but one that is its own otherness, distinguishing this from the simple negation of archetypal psychology.

Giegerich, Wolfgang, The Soul’s Logical Life Towards a Rigorous Notion of, 2020supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

the positivization of society does not abolish violence. Violence does not stem from the negativity of

Han contends that the positivization of contemporary society does not eliminate violence but merely transforms its origin, challenging the assumption that negativity is the source of social harm.

Han, Byung-Chul, The Burnout Society, 2010supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Those of us caught up in spiritual bypassing tend to slap the labels of 'positive' and 'negative' onto emotions as if such qualities were absolute givens. But the more we investigate the reality of our lives, the clearer it becomes that ascribing qualities like 'negative' and 'positive' to emotions is inevitably a context-bound undertaking.

Masters challenges the reification of 'negative' as an inherent emotional quality, arguing that spiritual bypassing depends on this false absolutism to justify the premature suppression of difficult affect.

Masters, Robert Augustus, Spiritual Bypassing When Spirituality Disconnects Us From, 2012supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Your ambition to transcend your negativity is now all but gone, as you realize right to your core that your true work is to reclaim and reembody it.

Masters reframes therapeutic work as the re-integration of what has been labeled 'negativity,' inverting the spiritual-bypassing imperative to transcend such states into an imperative to reclaim them.

Masters, Robert Augustus, Spiritual Bypassing When Spirituality Disconnects Us From, 2012supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Tiredness that inspires is tiredness of negative potency, namely of not-to.

Han, invoking Heidegger's analysis of the Sabbath, distinguishes the negative potency of 'not-to' — the capacity for creative pause and play — from the merely exhausted incapacity of depleted positive potency.

Han, Byung-Chul, The Burnout Society, 2010supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

forgiveness involves a tertiary appraisal: The costs of negativity in the service of self-protection are judged to be greater than the risks of letting go of negativity in the search for peace.

Pargament frames forgiveness as a cost-benefit appraisal of the sustained psychological burden of maintained negativity, positioning the letting-go of negativity as a spiritually and psychologically transformative act.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

it appears to him as if poised between two negations of itself… His mind at last negates God for a Beyond, or at least it seems to find God transcending Himself, denying Himself to the conception.

Aurobindo situates the spiritual seeker between two structural negations — the negation by the Inconscient below and the negation by the Transcendent beyond — indicating that negation is not an obstacle to but a structural feature of the soul's ascent.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Life Divine, 1939supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

logical negativity (! absolute negativity) 24, 56, 59, 67, 68, 71, 74, 75, 82, 96, 115, 123, 143, 155, 206, 210, 212, 214, 216, 226, 232, 266, 273

This index entry maps the pervasive recurrence of 'logical negativity' and 'absolute negativity' as organizing concepts throughout Giegerich's entire systematic argument, indicating the term's structural centrality to his project.

Giegerich, Wolfgang, The Soul’s Logical Life Towards a Rigorous Notion of, 2020aside

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

positivity culminates and negativity arises, hidden strength is overcome by weakness, and one becomes de

The Taoist I Ching employs positivity and negativity as cosmological-energetic polarities within the cyclical logic of yin-yang transformation, providing a non-Western correlate to the dialectical use of these terms elsewhere in the corpus.

Liu I-ming, The Taoist I Ching, 1986aside

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Nothing, like Being, is no thing. Neither is it the mere absence of a thing: it is a subject of action, Heidegger implies (it positively 'noths').

McGilchrist's engagement with Heidegger's 'das Nichts selbst nichtet' contextualizes negativity within the ontological tradition, treating nothingness not as absence but as an active, world-generating negativity.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021aside

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.

A bibliographic citation to Rozin and Royzman's empirical research on negativity bias signals the concept's parallel treatment in experimental psychology, offering a contrast to the dialectical-philosophical usage dominant in the depth-psychology corpus.

Menninghaus, Winfried, What Are Aesthetic Emotions?, 2015aside

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →