Mystery rites occupy a privileged site in the depth-psychology corpus, serving simultaneously as historical datum, anthropological template, and psychological metaphor. The scholarly conversation proceeds along several distinct but intersecting axes. Walter Burkert, working from rigorous classical philology and anthropology of sacrifice, insists on treating the Eleusinian and Samothracian mysteries as historically documentable institutions whose power derived from the structured interplay of secrecy, communal ordeal, and liminal transformation — not from mystical speculation about interior states. Jane Ellen Harrison grounds the rites in archaic social structures, arguing that initiatory drama at Eleusis, Samothrace, and among the Kouretes reflects transitional rites of adolescence, tribal fraternity, and cosmogonic re-enactment. The Jungian and Kerényian axis — visible in the collaborative Essays on a Science of Mythology — reads the telos of the Eleusinian myesis as a psychologically real encounter with archetypal death and rebirth, with Persephone and Dionysus as figures organizing the unconscious passage. Mircea Eliade expands the frame cosmologically, treating initiatory death-and-emergence as a universal repetition of cosmogony. Victor Turner and Erich Neumann contribute structural and developmental perspectives respectively. The central tension in the corpus is between historically specific ritual practice and transpersonal psychological significance — between what actually happened in the Telesterion and what the rites mean as living symbols of individuation.