Morning occupies a charged symbolic position across the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as temporal marker, epistemological category, and alchemical-mythological image. The most theoretically dense treatment appears in Edinger’s reading of Augustine via Jung, where ‘morning knowledge’ (cognitio matutina) designates knowledge of the Creator — divine, pre-rational, and ontologically prior — in explicit contrast to ‘evening knowledge,’ the rationalized knowing of created things. This polarity encodes the entire trajectory of Western consciousness: from sacred immediacy to secular instrumentality, from participation mystique to ego mastery. Von Franz’s Aurora Consurgens amplifies this through the alchemical dawn image, the rising aurora positioned midway between night and day, between nigredo and albedo, where the ‘golden hour’ signals transformation. Nietzsche’s Zarathustra compounds the mythic register: the hero springs from his cave ‘like a morning sun emerging from behind dark mountains,’ fusing personal renewal with cosmic recurrence. In mythological scholarship, Kerényi locates morning as the province of Eos, divine mother of Heosphoros (the Morning Star) and the winds — making morning a generative, archetypal threshold. Zhuangzi’s ‘three in the morning’ introduces an ironic counter-reading: morning allocation as cognitive illusion, a cautionary tale against mistaking verbal categories for ontological realities. Across these registers, morning consistently marks the liminal passage between unconscious depth and conscious light.