Within the depth-psychology corpus, money occupies a position far exceeding its economic function: it emerges as an archetypal psychic reality, a carrier of numinosity, and a force capable of either animating or annihilating soul. Hillman establishes the foundational claim that money, like love, death, and sexuality, is an archetypal dominant — inherently problematic, inevitably present, and 'devilishly divine.' Moore and Sardello approach it through the lens of soul-ecology: Moore warns that money, like sex, resists rational guidance and can 'swamp the soul,' driving consciousness into compulsion and greed, while Sardello, drawing on Norman O. Brown, proposes that money is nothing less than 'the soul of the world,' a living medium whose pathology lies in the reduction from quality to quantity. Seaford provides the philological and historical substrate, tracing how Greek coinage inaugurated the first thoroughly monetised society and thereby reconfigured cosmological imagination — contributing to presocratic impersonalism and tragic alienation. Across these positions, a central tension recurs: money as communal medium of exchange versus money as instrument of limitless individual accumulation, the latter figured consistently as a symptom of soul-loss. The question of money's ontological status — thing or relation, noun or verb, concrete or abstract — threads through every register of analysis.
In the library
22 passages
Money is a psychic reality, and as such gives rise to divisions and oppositions about it, much as other fundamental psychic realities-love and work, death and sexuality, politics and religion-are archetypal dominants which easily fall into opposing spiritual and material interpretations.
Hillman establishes money as an archetypal psychic reality comparable to love and death, rendering money problems not contingent but necessary and irreducible features of psychic life.
Hillman, James, A Blue Fire: The Essential James Hillman, 1989thesis
Like sex, money is so numinous, so filled with fantasy and emotion and resistant to rational guidance, that although it has much to offer, it can easily swamp the soul and carry consciousness off into compulsion and obsession.
Moore treats money as a numinous force analogous to sexuality, whose pathological forms — greed, avarice, embezzlement — signal the loss of its inherent soulfulness as a medium of communal exchange.
Moore, Thomas, Care of the Soul Twenty-fifth Anniversary Edition: A Guide, 1992thesis
Money, says Norman O. Brown, is the soul of the world. An extraordinary sentence! Now, we must try to see how the body of economics, a body in which we have attempted to find soul, functions in the world. Money is the function-ing of this body.
Sardello, via Brown, proposes money as the animating soul of the world-body, and argues that its redemption lies in a qualitative rather than quantitative apprehension — money as verb, not noun.
Sardello, Robert, Facing the World with Soul: The Reimagination of Modern Life, 1992thesis
Money is central to our lives. But what exactly is it? A definition is surprisingly elusive. Money is, puzzlingly, both a thing and a relation. And the relation – because it is one of power that is interpersonal and unspecific, over the labour not of another but of others in general – tends to be mystified.
Seaford opens with the ontological paradox of money as simultaneously thing and relation, establishing the mystification of its social power as the foundational problem for his historical-philosophical inquiry.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004thesis
the invention and rapid spread of coinage, which produced the first ever thoroughly monetised society. By transforming social relations, monetisation contributed to the ideas of the universe as an impersonal system (presocratic philosophy) and of the individual alienated from his own kin and from the gods (in tragedy).
Seaford's master argument: the monetisation of Greek society through coinage was a precondition for the emergence of presocratic impersonalism and tragic alienation, reshaping the mind of an entire civilization.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004thesis
Money (chrēmata) creates friends, honours, tyranny, physical beauty, wise speech, and pleasure even in disease (Soph. fr. 88). It is gold and silver 'by which war and the other things [my emphasis] thrive'.
Seaford documents the Greek tragic tradition's recognition of money as a universal means — capable of producing any good or power — and the attendant anxiety about its unlimited, corrupting pervasiveness.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
Money is uniquely desirable (8d, 8e), and the desire is unique also in being unlimited: to the unlimited accumulation and apparently unlimited power of money there belongs the unlimited desire for it that finds frequent expression.
Seaford argues that money's homogeneity and abstraction render the desire for it structurally unlimited in a way no concrete good can be, a dynamic dramatized repeatedly in Greek tragedy.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
money is socially constructed. Indeed the so-called sciati principle ('social construction is all there is'), often misapplied to nature, applies much better to money.
Seaford argues that money is paradigmatically socially constructed — valued not for use but for its power to meet social obligation — establishing the theoretical framework for his analysis of its cultural effects.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
The Parmenidean One projects monetary value as transcending not only multiplicity of goods but also time and place, thereby as seeming to impose, permanently and everywhere, its own homogeneity on all things.
Seaford draws a structural analogy between the homogenizing, transcendent value of coinage and the Parmenidean metaphysical One, suggesting money unconsciously shaped presocratic ontology.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
In monetised exchange, as in the cosmology of Anaximander, opposites originate in, and embody, a single substance into which they are reabsorbed. So too the opposition between injurer and injured is resolved by the all-embracing power of monetary value to absorb the injury.
Seaford maps the logic of monetary exchange onto Anaximander's cosmological apeiron, arguing that monetisation provided the conceptual template for the presocratic resolution of opposites in a single underlying substance.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
money may enter into the unconscious process of cosmic projection without itself being conceptualised as 'money', for which the Greeks do not have a precise word.
Seaford contends that money operated as an unconscious template for Greek cosmological projection precisely because it lacked a precise Greek conceptual name, making its influence structurally invisible.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
virtue (is the only thing that) cannot be acquired by money. In Euripides' Electra money does not prevail. When Socrates is told that he should charge a price for his valuable conversation... he replies that just as charging for physical beauty is prostitution, so too wisdom should not be exchanged for money.
Seaford traces the tragic and Socratic resistance to money's universal exchangeability, identifying virtue and wisdom as the domains that define themselves against monetary valuation.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
social power is impersonal, rather that it consists of human use of the impersonal power of money.
Seaford distinguishes the impersonality inherent to monetary power from the projection of personal power onto objects, linking this to broader arguments about money's role in producing the impersonal cosmos of Greek philosophy.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
What distinguishes coinage from all the other things known to me that have performed money functions is that on the one hand, unlike most such things, it bears a sign, and on the other hand, unlike all other such things that do bear a sign (such as paper), it is also inherently valuable.
Seaford identifies the unique historical novelty of Greek coinage — the combination of intrinsic value and imposed sign — as the material basis for the abstract yet concrete nature of monetary value.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
money is impersonal and yet omnipotent, must pre-exist and outlive all transactions, and is the equivalent of all things.
Seaford crystallizes the quasi-divine attributes of money — impersonality, omnipotence, eternal equivalence — that made it a template for Greek conceptions of cosmic divinity in thinkers such as Xenophanes.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
the meanings with which it is invested are, it has been argued, 'quite as much a product of the cultural matrix into which it is incorporated as of the economic functions it performs as a means of exchange, unit of account, store of value.'
Seaford establishes that money's symbolic meanings cannot be predicted from its economic functions alone, requiring attention to the cultural and ritual matrix in which it circulates.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
the opposition between unique personal identity and typical value is exquisitely embodied in their each being recognised through a charaktēr. The ambiguity of charaktēr between scar and coin-mark represents the antithesis between the ancient uniqueness of the hero... and a world in which the impersonal power of money has not only annihilated the uniqueness of the mythical hero.
Seaford reads Euripides' recognition scenes as sites where monetary impersonality intrudes upon heroic individuality, the ambiguity of charaktēr (scar/coin-mark) enacting the cultural tension between unique identity and abstract value.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
Creon is said to project his obsession with money onto others... Creon's perversion of death ritual is envisaged as a hideous exchange, in which he makes a profit.
Seaford reads Creon in the Antigone as a figure whose monetary obsession perverts the ritual economy of death, transforming burial obligations into a logic of exchange and profit.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004supporting
We are tempted to find satisfaction in secondary rewards, such as money, prestige, and the trappings of success.
Moore identifies money as a secondary, compensatory reward that diverts attention from the soul of work itself, symptomatizing a narcissistic repair rather than genuine engagement.
Moore, Thomas, Care of the Soul Twenty-fifth Anniversary Edition: A Guide, 1992aside
the new monetary economy. In sixth-century Greece there did indeed occur a radically new conception (not necessarily superior to what preceded it) of the world and of the individual, for which a precondition was a radical development in socio-economic formation.
Seaford situates the monetary economy as a necessary socio-historical precondition for the sixth-century Greek revolution in conceptions of world and individual, without valorizing it as progress.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004aside
coinage is early used by the individual for trade. And so an instrument of the short-term order (coinage used for trade) acquires some of its unique effectiveness from the long-term order (sacrifice).
Seaford traces the ritual ancestry of coinage in sacrificial distribution, arguing that Greek coinage derived part of its social efficacy from its deep connection to communal sacrificial practice.
Seaford, Richard, Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy, 2004aside
More than 80 bank books were also turned up, noting deposits of more than $112,000. Some of the deposits, of only $10 were made, a friend said, because Aichele coveted the minor gifts with which banks encouraged new depositors.
Sardello presents an extreme case of hoarding as a phenomenological illustration of money-as-compulsion, the soul's energy frozen in accumulation rather than circulated as gift or exchange.
Sardello, Robert, Facing the World with Soul: The Reimagination of Modern Life, 1992aside