Metabolism enters the depth-psychology corpus along two distinct axes, each carrying different theoretical weight. The first, philosophically the more consequential, is Hans Jonas’s phenomenological biology as developed and extended by Evan Thompson: metabolism is not merely a biochemical fact but the ontological ground of selfhood, teleology, and concern. In Thompson’s rendering of Jonas, metabolism is ‘the constant regeneration of an island of form amidst a sea of matter and energy,’ the process by which an organism marks off an internal identity, constitutes its own norms, and acquires the minimal ‘concern’ that Spinoza named conatus. This reading binds metabolism to autopoiesis, individuality, and the emergence of mind from life — making it a central term in enactivist and phenomenological psychology. The second axis is neurodevelopmental and clinical: Schore’s affect-regulation programme tracks oxidative metabolism (cytochrome oxidase activity, glucose transport, blood-brain barrier maturation) as the energetic substrate of cortical differentiation and emotional development. A third, more applied axis appears in addiction and nutritional psychology, where altered metabolism among substance-using populations indexes disrupted homeostasis, disturbed body composition, and impaired recovery. Marion Woodman’s Jungian somatic psychology adds a fourth register, treating body metabolism as the biological ground upon which psychic shadow problems are enacted. Together these positions reveal metabolism as a concept that travels from the philosophy of life to clinical neuroscience to somatic depth work.