Mazdean Anthropology designates the cluster of doctrines concerning human nature, constitution, and destiny as articulated within the Zoroastrian religious universe — including the teachings on the soul’s celestial double (Daena, Fravarti), the luminous body, eschatological judgment at the Chinvat Bridge, the primordial man Gayomart, the resurrection of the dead under Saoshyant, and the ethical dualism that assigns to each human being an irreducible role in the cosmic struggle between Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu. Within the depth-psychology corpus, Mazdean anthropology surfaces as a persistent comparative reference across several distinct registers. Henry Corbin deploys it as the philosophical and phenomenological ground for understanding the ‘man of light,’ the Fravarti as celestial twin and guide, and the Xvarnah as luminous glory constitutive of personal identity — readings that carry direct implications for Sufi and Shi’ite spirituality. Joseph Campbell treats Mazdean accounts of Gayomart, the first couple, and the final resurrection as mythologically coherent cosmogonic narratives whose eschatological logic parallels Orphic, Indian, and Judaeo-Christian traditions. Mircea Eliade engages Mazdean apocalypticism as a model of cyclical time and cosmic renewal. C. G. Jung references Ahura Mazda and the amesha spentas as archetypes of moral differentiation within monotheism. The unifying tension across these voices concerns whether Mazdean anthropology is primarily a historical-religious datum or a living phenomenological resource for understanding the psyche’s own luminous structure.