Across the depth-psychology corpus, ‘manifold’ operates on at least three distinct registers that intersect and occasionally collapse into one another. In the Neoplatonic lineage, most fully articulated by Plotinus, the manifold designates the ontological condition of multiplicity that necessarily presupposes a prior unity: every manifold is derivative, a falling-away from The One into differentiated being, yet also the vehicle through which the One becomes intelligible to itself. This metaphysical grammar was absorbed, often tacitly, by Jung and his successors. In Jung’s own usage—most visibly in The Red Book and in the Seven Sermons passages embedded within Memories, Dreams, Reflections—the manifold names the irreducible plurality of the psychic world: the gods are many, the soul is many, the outer and inner worlds are each ‘manifold in essence,’ and the solitary thinker must negotiate between proximity and distance to that plurality without being torn apart by it. Hillman and Berry, working from archetypal premises, reprise the tension between polymorphous multiplicity and synthetic unity, tracing it through Freudian developmental theory as well as through mythic imagery. Campbell’s deployment of the term in the Bhagavad Gita episode frames the manifold as the cosmic theophany itself—the whole universe in its manifold divisions concentrated within the divine body. The persistent tension in the corpus is thus between the manifold as problem (requiring reduction to unity) and the manifold as irreducible value (requiring participation rather than resolution).