Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘manhood’ functions not as a sociological category but as a psychic threshold — a condition that must be earned, conferred, and structurally consolidated through initiatory ordeal. The literature converges on a striking diagnosis: in modern Western culture, the ritual mechanisms that once facilitated the boy-to-man transition have largely collapsed, producing what Moore and Gillette call ‘Boy psychology’ masquerading in adult male bodies. Robert Bly and James Hollis elaborate this crisis mythopoeically, reading fairy tales and wound-narratives as maps of the initiatory journey that fathers and tribal elders can no longer reliably provide. Campbell and von Franz supply the comparative-anthropological grounding, demonstrating that initiatory rites of circumcision, subincision, and sacred ordeal universally function to sever the boy from maternal symbiosis and install him within the mythological order of the fathers. Jung’s own comment on the Quranic Khidr narrative frames manhood as the moment of inheriting buried treasure — psychic depth earned only at full growth. The term thus sits at the intersection of initiation, the father complex, archetypes of mature masculinity, the mother complex, and the wound. Its recurrent tensions involve the question of whether manhood is achieved through external rite, internal psychological individuation, or both — and whether its pursuit risks regressive aggression or enables genuinely generative selfhood.