The mammalian brain, in the depth-psychology and affective neuroscience corpus, is most consistently encountered as the middle tier of Paul MacLean’s triune brain model — the paleomammalian or limbic layer that mediates social emotions, attachment, separation distress, play, and maternal nurturance. Panksepp is the dominant scholarly voice, situating this structure between the reptilian basal ganglia and the neomammalian neocortex and insisting that the evolutionarily conserved neurodynamics of the older mammalian brain constitute the irreducible biological substrate of human feeling. Levine and Ogden carry the triune model into clinical somatic and trauma work, treating the mammalian brain as the emotional processing center whose dysregulation underlies dissociation, affect storms, and the incomprehensibility of post-traumatic symptoms. Berger applies MacLean’s framework to addiction and emotional sobriety. The central theoretical tension in the literature runs between those who treat this tier as providing indispensable affective foundations — emotions cannot be generated by neocortical stimulation alone — and those, following Barrett and LeDoux, who question the architectural cleanness of the triune metaphor. For depth psychology, the mammalian brain is significant because it maps onto Jung’s phylogenetic layering of the psyche, and Levine explicitly invokes that correspondence. The term thus operates at the junction of evolutionary biology, trauma theory, and depth-psychological individuation.