The concept of ‘magic power’ occupies a wide and contested terrain in the depth-psychology corpus, ranging from its archaic roots in mana, taboo, and animistic world-views to its transformation into psychological categories such as affect, will, and archetypal energy. Freud situates magic within the omnipotence of thought characteristic of the animistic stage of mental development, while Jung and those writing in his tradition — particularly von Franz, Albertus Magnus as quoted, and Moore — locate magic power in the soul’s capacity to alter external reality through the intensity of its affective states, a view inherited from Avicenna. Rank’s philological investigations identify magic power with the sovereign word, the primal utterance that commands the elements. Benveniste’s linguistic analysis reveals that the Greek kudos names a specifically magical power of victory belonging to the gods and temporarily granted to kings. Moore recasts magic power as the Magician archetype’s ability to channel unconscious energies — a force so potent it can destroy the ego if improperly metered. The Tarot commentators (Nichols, Pollack, Jodorowsky, Place) trace the same psychic dynamic through the figure of the Magician as one who consciously directs cosmic force through will and imagination. Von Franz, critically, warns that this power degenerates into mere ego-trick when dissociated from genuine interiority. Tension runs throughout between magic power as numinous gift and as instrument of inflation.