Luther

I grew to understand the numinous and its difference from the rational in Luther's De Servo Arbitrio long before I identified it in the 'qadosh' of the Old Testament

Otto credits Luther's De Servo Arbitrio as the primary experiential source from which he derived his concept of the numinous, positioning Luther as the phenomenological origin of his entire analytical framework.

Otto, Rudolf, The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational, 1917thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

this treatise of Luther's becomes a sort of psychological key to related phases of religious experience... in his battles with 'desperatio' and with Satan, in his constantly recurring religious catastrophes and fits of melancholy

Otto identifies Luther's De Servo Arbitrio as a psychological document disclosing the non-rational, numinous substrate beneath all rational theological discourse about wrath and judgment.

Otto, Rudolf, The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational, 1917thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Luther assumed the existence of an innate evilness in man's nature, which directs his will for evil and makes it impossible for any man to perform any good deed on the basis of his nature.

Fromm argues that Luther's doctrine of innate human depravity and the complete absence of free will constitutes the theological foundation of a psychology of submission and escape from freedom.

Fromm, Erich, Escape from Freedom, 1941thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Luther's personality as well as his teachings shows ambivalence toward authority. On the one hand he is overawed by authority... and on the other hand he rebels against authority—that of the Church.

Fromm diagnoses Luther's character structure as fundamentally ambivalent toward authority — simultaneously submissive and rebellious — which he reads as the psychodynamic template for the authoritarian personality.

Fromm, Erich, Escape from Freedom, 1941thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Luther's faith had that compensatory quality... Doubt is the starting point of modern philosophy; the need to silence it had a most powerful stimulus on the development of modern philosophy and science.

Fromm interprets Luther's faith as a reaction formation against unresolved existential doubt, linking this compensatory dynamic to the broader modern compulsion to achieve certainty through submission or intellectual mastery.

Fromm, Erich, Escape from Freedom, 1941thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

it was rather the actual contact with the 'real' and material in the Communion, and the feeling-value of this contact for Luther himself, that prevailed over the evangelical principle

Jung interprets Luther's insistence on the real presence in the Eucharist as psychologically determined by his type — an extraverted feeling-orientation that required sensory, material grounding for the experience of grace.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Luther's God was characterized by his wrath... 'his fury or wrath toward self-satisfied sinners is also immeasurable and infinite.' His will was past finding out.

Armstrong presents Luther's theology of divine wrath as psychologically central to his breakthrough doctrine of justification, underscoring the experiential terror that drove his theological innovation.

supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Luther claimed that he had been reborn when he had formulated his doctrine of justification, but in fact it does not seem as though all his anxieties had been allayed. He remained a disturbed, angry and violent man.

Armstrong argues that Luther's theological breakthrough failed to resolve the underlying psychological disturbance driving his spiritual search, calling into question the integrative efficacy of his soteriology.

supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Faith that Christ has genuinely done his work was part of what Luther meant by faith... But this is only one part of Luther's faith, the other part being far more vital... the assurance, namely, that I, this individual I, just as I stand, without one plea, etc., am saved now and forever.

James distinguishes between the intellectual and the immediate-intuitive components of Luther's faith, using the Lutherian conversion as a phenomenological model for the 'faith-state' as a form of direct assurance rather than doctrinal assent.

James, William, The Varieties of Religious Experience Amazon, 1902supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

one main point in Luther's teachings was his emphasis on the evilness of human nature, the uselessness of his will and of his efforts... they had laid the ground for this development by breaking man's spiritual backbone, his feeling of dignity and pride

Fromm traces the modern subordination of individual selfhood to impersonal economic forces directly to the Lutheran theological dismantling of human dignity and autonomous will.

Fromm, Erich, Escape from Freedom, 1941supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

When Luther, in his immense manly way, swept off by a stroke of his hand the very notion of a debit and credit account kept with individuals by the Almighty, he stretched the soul's imagination and saved theology from puerility.

James credits Luther with a liberating psychological act — the abolition of a punitive, ledger-keeping God — that expanded the imaginative and moral horizon of theological anthropology.

James, William, The Varieties of Religious Experience Amazon, 1902supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

The new religions were not the religions of a wealthy upper class but of the urban middle class, the poor in the cities, and the peasants. They carried an appeal to these groups because they gave expression to a new feeling of freedom and independence as well as to

Fromm situates Lutheranism sociologically as the religious response of economically precarious classes who experienced both the emancipatory and the anxiety-provoking dimensions of early modern freedom.

Fromm, Erich, Escape from Freedom, 1941supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Bohme was an heir of Luther, preserving what in Luther's own school came to be overlooked and disregarded. For the Lutheran school has itself not done justice to the numinous side of the Christian idea of God.

Otto argues that post-Luther Lutheranism progressively rationalized and moralized the numinous dimension that Luther himself had experienced most intensely, with Böhme preserving the mystical legacy that the Lutheran school suppressed.

Otto, Rudolf, The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational, 1917supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

the dramatic experience which the discovery of the significatio passiva was for the young Luther (still under the influence of Tauler's mysticism). In the presence of the Psalm verse In justitia tua libera me, he experienced a movement of revolt and despair

Corbin reads Luther's transformative encounter with the passive meaning of divine justice — mediated by Tauler's mysticism — as a paradigmatic instance of the existential reversal at the heart of mystical theology.

Corbin, Henry, Alone with the Alone: Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn Arabi, 1969supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

he found himself unleashing forces of destruction that were out of his control, forces which set about destroying the very things he valued, forces against which he inveighed finally without effect.

McGilchrist invokes Luther as a parallel to Heidegger — a reformer whose originating impulse was hijacked by destructive forces he could neither foresee nor contain, illustrating the recurring fate of attempts to transcend established paradigms.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World, 2009aside

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

'I venture to put my trust in the one God alone, the invisible and incomprehensible, who hath created Heaven and Earth and is alone above all creatures.'

Otto cites Luther's articulation of the deus absconditus — the invisible, incomprehensible God — as evidence of the apophatic, non-rational strand running through Lutheran theology alongside its more rational-ethical dimensions.

Otto, Rudolf, The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational, 1917aside

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Luther's attacks were directed particularly against the Schoolmen of the late Middle Ages whom he called 'Sau Theologen.' Duns Scotus stressed the role of will.

Fromm traces the theological background of Luther's anti-scholastic polemics to the late-medieval debate over will and merit, positioning Lutheran radicalism as a reaction against the voluntarist tradition of Duns Scotus and Ockham.

Fromm, Erich, Escape from Freedom, 1941aside

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →