Luminosity

the concept of the intellectus agens also coincides psycho-logically with Jung’s conception of the ‘luminosity’ (or twi-light consciousness) of archetypal contents in the unconscious.

Von Franz explicitly equates the Scholastic intellectus agens with Jung’s ‘luminosity,’ positioning it as a quasi-conscious, ordering power inherent in unconscious archetypal contents and extending even into physical space-time.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, Aurora Consurgens: A Document Attributed to Thomas Aquinas on the Problem of Opposites in Alchemy, 1966thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The word ösel (Tibetan) or prabhasvara (Sanskrit), which means ‘luminosity,’ is also used a lot rather than ‘shunyata.’ You find this reference to the Tantric tradition in the Buddha’s last turning of the Wheel of Dharma: instead of saying, ‘Form is empty, emptiness is form,’ he says that form is luminous.

Trungpa distinguishes luminosity (prabhasvara/ösel) from shunyata as the Tantric term that captures the dynamic, blissful, energetic quality of reality that the emptiness doctrine alone cannot express.

Trungpa, Chögyam, Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism, 1973thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Luminosity here is not merely optical light but also the illumination of knowledge inherent in sattva that reveals things as they really are.

Bryant, glossing Patañjali, defines luminosity as an epistemic quality of sattva-intelligence: the capacity to reveal the true nature of things when the mind’s highest potential is manifested.

Bryant, Edwin F., The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: A New Edition, Translation, and Commentary, 2009thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The photisms of pure light thus described correspond to the state of the heart which is that of the ‘pacified soul.’ The colored photisms which Najm Razi proceeds to describe rise step by step from the moment when the spiritual individuality is triumphantly freed from the lower ego.

Corbin presents luminosity as a graduated phenomenology of inner photisms in Iranian Sufism, where stages of colored light correspond precisely to degrees of spiritual liberation and self-transcendence.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Lahjl declares that black is the color of the pure divine Ipseity in Itself … ‘The black color, if you follow me, is light of pure Ipseity; within this Darkness is the Water of Life.’

Corbin elaborates the paradox of ‘black light’ in Iranian Sufism—a luminosity that transcends ordinary light and darkness, denoting the absolute divine Ipseity whose very excess of presence appears as darkness to the inner eye.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

that of the arcanum (Jesus) is luminous black (aswad nurani); this is the ‘black light,’ the luminous Night about which we were informed by Najm Razi as well as by the Rose Garden of Mystery.

Corbin maps the seven subtle centers (lataif) of Semnanī onto a progression of colored luminosities, with ‘luminous black’ (black light) representing the highest esoteric stage before the supreme green of divine mystery.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The perception of the colored photisms coincides with the moment when these suprasensory senses come into action as the organs of the man of light, of the ‘particle of the divine light.’

Corbin demonstrates that luminosity in Iranian Sufism is not a metaphor but a perceptual event: the activation of suprasensory organs that register colored lights as indices of the soul’s transmutation.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

he go and see that dungeon of the Demons … and that he be a liberator and savior for that luminosity of gods which from the beginning of all things was beaten by Ahriman … and which they hold captive even now.

Jonas presents the Manichaean-Gnostic doctrine of luminosity as scattered divine particles imprisoned in matter, whose cosmic liberation and repatriation is the central soteriological task.

Hans Jonas, The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity, 1958supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It is the true and unceasing effulgence of God’s own light in the soul: ‘The God who said, “Out of darkness let light shine”, has made His light shine in our hearts, to give us the illumination of the knowledge of Christ’s glory.’

The Philokalia presents luminosity as the uncreated divine effulgence genuinely dwelling in the soul—not merely a conceptual illumination but an ontological participation in God’s own light.

Palmer, G. E. H. and Sherrard, Philip and Ware, Kallistos (trs.), The Philokalia, Volume 4, 1995supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Later Iranian Sufi masters refer to the Night of light, the dark Noontide, the black Light. And in the Manichean faith it is the flames of the aurora borealis that are visualized in the Columna gloriae as composed of all the particles of Light reascending from the infernum to the Earth of light.

Corbin situates the luminosity complex within a cosmological framework shared by Iranian Sufism and Manicheism, where particles of light perpetually seek to return from darkness to their celestial source.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Perfect Nature is the heavenly paredros, the Sage’s Guide of light. To understand its role and manifestation, it is necessary to picture to oneself the anthropology from which it is inseparable, an anthropology whose hero is the man of light, held captive by Darkness and struggling to free himself from Darkness.

Corbin articulates the anthropological premise underlying luminosity in Hermetism and Sufism: the human being is essentially a ‘man of light’ whose luminous nature is enslaved by darkness and must be recovered through spiritual practice.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the two circles of light of the eyes appear, it is the sign of an excellent spiritual state. If they remain hidden, this concealment indicates a lack, a preponderance of the dark nature.

Corbin describes the diagnostic function of inner luminosity in Sufi practice: the appearance or absence of light-circles during contemplation serves as a precise indicator of the soul’s spiritual condition on the scales of the suprasensory.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The idea of a ‘physiology of the man of light,’ as outlined in Najm Kobra’s theory of the suprasensory senses and Semnanī’s theory of subtle organs enveloped in color, links up with Goethe’s vast scheme.

Corbin connects Iranian Sufi luminosity-phenomenology to Goethe’s study of physiological colors, arguing that both describe a non-materialist ‘physiology’ of light-perception that transcends ordinary sensory empiricism.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

archetype(s) … luminosity of, 124

An index reference confirming that Jung explicitly theorizes a ‘luminosity of archetypes’ as a distinct property warranting sustained treatment in his theological-psychological work.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Answer to Job, 1952supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

it is not the Ahrimanian Night, but the Night Ineffable, the Night of symbols, which alone can pacify the dogmatic madnesses of Day.

Corbin distinguishes the luminous ‘Night of symbols’—a superconscious darkness that is a form of light—from the Ahrimanian Night of mere unconsciousness, insisting that luminosity can paradoxically inhabit darkness.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

he used to see a bright light, and sometimes this apparition seemed to him to have the form of a serpent. It appeared to be full of shining eyes, which were yet no eyes.

Jung cites Ignatius of Loyola’s visionary experience of a luminous serpentine figure as an empirical instance of the autonomous luminosity characteristic of archetypal apparitions.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, 1960aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the world of colors in the pure state, that is, the orbs of light, is the totality of the acts of this Light which makes them lights and cannot itself be manifested except by these acts, without ever being itself visible.

Corbin articulates a key paradox: the source of luminosity is itself invisible, manifesting only through its colored epiphanies, which are always relative to the spiritual state of the mystic perceiving them.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →