The depth-psychology corpus approaches liberty not as a political abstraction but as a psychic condition whose genealogy, phenomenology, and pathologies demand rigorous analysis. Benveniste’s Indo-European philology grounds the inquiry: liberty is not simply freedom from constraint but the quality of belonging to a vital, generative stock — liber, eleútheros, freis — each rooted in organic metaphors of growth, kinship, and the procreative spirit. Onians deepens this etymological archaeology, showing that for early Romans freedom was the affair of the genius, the procreative force in man, while the ‘wine of freedom’ rite in Greek practice made liberation literally a replenishing of vital fluid. Against this archaic substrate, Plato’s political psychology diagnoses excess liberty as the mother of tyranny, a dynamic in which unrestricted appetite destroys the very psychic ordering that makes autonomy possible. Jung transforms the category: liberty becomes the anima freed from the tyranny of the senses, a psychopomp figure leading toward Elysian integration. Abrams reads Blake and Shelley as encoding liberty as the emancipation of visionary consciousness — Jerusalem itself is called Liberty among the Children of Albion. Merleau-Ponty situates freedom phenomenologically in the living present: genuine liberty is the act of drawing together the past and committing oneself elsewhere, always finite, never absolute. The apostolic and pneumatological tradition (John of Damascus, von Franz, Gregory of Nyssa) identifies liberty with the Spirit of God, where the Holy Spirit’s presence is the very condition of freedom. Across these registers the central tension persists: liberty as inner psychic integration versus liberty as social-political status, with the risk that excess of either dissolves into its opposite.