The Knight in the depth-psychology corpus is not a unitary figure but a dense constellation of meanings distributed across mythological, archetypal, and symbolic registers. Campbell treats the Knight as the embodiment of individuated spiritual quest — most fully in the Arthurian Parzival material, where the knight’s trajectory from naïve bumpkin to Grail-seeker maps the soul’s movement through error, compassion suppressed by social conformity, and eventual redemption. Auerbach, approaching from literary phenomenology, identifies the knight as a social-metaphysical category: one for whom feats of arms and courtly love are not episodes but constitutive conditions of being — to cease adventuring is to cease being a knight. In Tarot scholarship (Nichols, Pollack, Jodorowsky, Hamaker-Zondag, Place, Greer), the Knight functions as a court-card archetype signifying directed, dynamic, yang energy positioned between the receptive Page and the sovereign King — a messenger or catalyst carrying elemental force toward transformative crisis. Jodorowsky specifically situates the Knights at the numerological threshold of renewing dissolution. Harding’s visionary fantasy deploys the knight as a psychic force-image in active imagination, incarnating directional libido. The central tension across these positions is between the knight as outer social role and the knight as inner archetypal imperative — a tension Parzival’s story makes explicit when loyalty to chivalric convention silences the compassionate question that would heal the wounded king.