Kneeling occupies a remarkably layered position within the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as a somatic gesture, a ritual act, and a symbol of the psyche’s relation to powers greater than the ego. The literature approaches kneeling from at least three distinct angles. First, from the anthropological-philological tradition — most richly represented by Onians — kneeling is understood as an act whose meaning is inseparable from archaic beliefs about the knees as repositories of life-force and generative power; the suppliant’s kneeling is thus not merely positional humility but a direct engagement with the seat of vitality itself. Second, within liturgical and ascetic traditions, from John Climacus through the Philokalia, kneeling (and its cognate prostrations and genuflections) serves as a bodily technology of compunction — the body enacting the soul’s surrender before the divine. Third, Jungian and archetypal amplifications — Hillman, Nichols, von Franz — read kneeling iconographically: figures kneeling before the Mater Sapientia, the Star, or a sacred vessel embody the ego’s necessary humbling before the unconscious or the Self. Across these registers, a central tension persists: whether kneeling is primarily a downward movement — submission, supplication, abasement — or whether, as Brazier and the body-psychotherapy tradition suggest, it initiates an inward orientation that paradoxically generates renewed power.