Within the depth-psychology corpus, Ithaca operates on two distinct registers that rarely intersect but mutually reinforce one another. At the literal-geographical level, it functions as Odysseus’s island home — the destination that anchors the entire Odyssey, the telos toward which all wandering tends. Commentators from Lattimore to Wilson’s Homer translation repeatedly situate it as a rocky, westward-facing island whose very harshness is paradoxically prized by its owner: ‘My Ithaca is set apart, most distant, facing the dark. It is a rugged land, but good at raising children.’ At the symbolic-psychological level, Ithaca condenses the themes of homecoming, rightful inheritance, identity-under-threat, and the recovery of sovereignty — themes that depth psychology from Campbell’s hero-journey framework to Hollis’s midlife theory reads as interior imperatives. The suitors’ occupation of Ithaca, Telemachus’s uncertain claim to its throne, and Odysseus’s prolonged exile together constitute a mythopoetic map of psychological displacement. Secondary occurrences in the corpus are purely bibliographic — Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY — yet even these carry a faint irony: the city that publishes Greek thought bears the name of the wanderer’s longed-for home.