The intuition function occupies a privileged and contested position within the depth-psychology corpus. Jung established it as one of the four cardinal psychological functions — alongside thinking, feeling, and sensation — classifying it as an irrational perceiving function whose defining characteristic is the apprehension of possibilities, hidden connections, and temporal depth rather than immediate sensory data. In the Tavistock Lectures, Jung famously glosses intuition as the faculty that delivers the ‘hunch’: a perception of ‘where things come from and where they are going.’ Von Franz and Hillman elaborate the clinical consequences of this definition, demonstrating how inferior intuition in sensation types erupts as sinister premonition, paranoid suspicion, or uncanny prophetic accuracy. Hillman independently underscores intuition’s paradoxical character — clear, swift, and total in its deliverances, yet equally capable of categorical error when untempered by the sibling functions. Beebe extends the structural analysis into a developmental key, examining how intuition participates in the hierarchical arrangement of dominant, auxiliary, tertiary, and inferior positions across sixteen type profiles. Romanyshyn draws intuition into epistemological territory, arguing that its attention to ‘hidden possibilities’ makes it uniquely suited to imaginal research methodologies. A persistent tension runs through the literature between those who prize intuition as the highest cognitive form and those — including Jung himself — who insist no function possesses inherent superiority.