Introjective Identification

Introjective identification occupies a contested but generative position within the depth-psychological corpus, functioning as the complementary pole to projective identification in the Kleinian account of early object relations. Klein’s own retrospective formulations — most fully elaborated in the 1957 volume and its editorial apparatus — establish introjection and projection not as isolated mechanisms but as a dialectical pair whose optimal balance underwrites ego integration and the assimilation of internal objects. The clinical stakes are considerable: excessive introjection, like excessive projection, distorts the inner world and corrupts object relations across the lifespan. Bion extends the Kleinian schema by situating introjective processes within the container-contained model, where the infant’s introjection of a modified, detoxified experience depends on the mother’s capacity to receive and transform projected states. Ogden’s theorization of the analytic third reformulates introjective identification as a contributor to the partial collapse of individual subjectivity in the intersubjective field, rendering both projective and introjective modes structurally inseparable from the analysis of transference. Winnicott, characteristically oblique, approaches the territory through the concept of projective identification in clinical vignettes, but his framing of the mirror function implies a corresponding introjective movement. The Jungian literature, by contrast, addresses related phenomena under the rubrics of identification, introjection of the imago, and participation mystique, without adopting the Kleinian technical vocabulary. The central tension across the corpus is between models that treat introjective identification as a pathological excess to be resolved and those that recognize it as a constitutive process in psychological development and analytic change.

In the library 15 passages

the course of ego-development and object-relations depends on the degree to which an optimal balance between introjection and projection in the early stages of development can be achieved. This in turn has a bearing on the integration of the ego and the assimilation of internal objects.

Klein argues that the balance between introjective and projective processes is foundational to ego integration and healthy object relations, with any excess in either direction producing developmental disturbance.

Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

I also came to recognize the major importance for identification of certain projective mechanisms which are complementary to the introjective ones.

Klein explicitly positions projective identification as the complement to introjective identification, insisting that a complete theory of identification requires both mechanisms.

Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the ego takes possession by projection of an external object — first of all the mother — and makes it into an extension of the self. The object becomes to some extent a representative of the ego, and these processes are in my view the basis for identification by projection

Klein describes how the ego’s projective appropriation of the object is the mechanism underlying identification, establishing the conceptual ground from which introjective identification is distinguished.

Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Claustrophobia, as I have elsewhere suggested, derives from two main sources: projective identification into the mother leading to an anxiety of imprisonment inside her; and reintrojection resulting in a feeling that inside oneself one is hemmed in by resentful internal objects.

Klein demonstrates clinically how introjective identification — here reintrojection — generates specific anxiety configurations (claustrophobia) by populating the inner world with persecutory internal objects.

Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

projective identification involves a type of partial collapse of the dialectical movement of subjectivity and intersubjectivity, resulting in the subjugation of the individual subjectivities of analyst and analysand by the analytic third.

Ogden reconceptualizes projective and introjective identification as jointly constituting an intersubjective third that temporarily subjugates individual subjectivity, transforming both analyst and analysand.

Ogden, Thomas, The Analytic Third: Implications for Psychoanalytic Theory and Technique, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Freud clearly speaks of a libidinal attachment to an object, the mother’s breast, which precedes auto-erotism and narcissism … These formulations come close to what I described as the first introjected objects, for by definition identificat

Klein anchors her concept of introjective identification in Freud’s account of primary identification, positioning the introjection of early objects as the phylogenetically and ontogenetically prior form of ego formation.

Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Here then was an area recently developed in which projective identification had become possible … The patient was now able to discuss cross-identifications and to look back on certain experiences of the recent

Winnicott traces, in clinical vignette, the emergence of projective identification as a newly available capacity, implying the prior introjective work that must occur before cross-identification becomes therapeutically accessible.

Winnicott, D W, Playing and Reality, 1971supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

she had evolved a technique for projective identifications of the split-off male element, giving her some vicarious experience in terms of pupils and other people into whom she could project this part of herself

Winnicott’s case material illustrates how the failure of introjective consolidation of split-off elements compels a compensatory reliance on projective identification as a substitute for internal ownership.

Winnicott, D W, Playing and Reality, 1971supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the Devil stood for the seducing and dangerous father; he also represented parts of Fabian’s mind, superego as well as id … he shows in an extreme form that component of infantile emotional life which i

Klein uses the literary figure of the Devil to illustrate pathological projective identification operating at the expense of introjective assimilation, leaving the protagonist unable to reclaim projected parts of the self.

Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Projective identification as a theoretical perspective is a complicated issue with a sometimes unclear definition and history. It has been viewed as a diagnostic indicator, a defensive operation, and a communication device.

Sedgwick surveys the contested theoretical status of projective identification within Jungian clinical practice, noting that its definitional ambiguity extends to its relationship with complementary introjective processes.

Sedgwick, David, An Introduction to Jungian Psychotherapy: The Therapeutic Relationship, 2001supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the projective-introjective mixing of the personalities described throughout this book, and the secured-symbolizing phase, which speaks more to a lower-tension, even playful and creative, working alliance achieved by patient and therapist.

Sedgwick frames therapy as a sequence moving through projective-introjective mixing toward symbolization, implicitly treating introjective identification as a phase-specific process necessary for therapeutic transformation.

Sedgwick, David, An Introduction to Jungian Psychotherapy: The Therapeutic Relationship, 2001supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

he introjects on this occasion the paternal image … Introjection, in short, is that, to organise oneself subjectively in such a way that the father, in effect, under the form of the not too cross ego-ideal, should be a signifier from which the little person, male or female, comes to contemplate his or herself

Lacan redefines introjection as a subjective self-organization around a paternal signifier, offering a structuralist reformulation that diverges from the Kleinian model of introjective identification while addressing the same structural phenomenon.

Lacan, Jacques, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VIII: Transference, 2015supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Failure to modify the fundamental oral desires and anxieties has many consequences … he was unable to establish securely the good breast, the good mother, in his inner world — an initial failure which i

Klein demonstrates that failed introjective identification of the good breast leaves the inner world without its foundational positive object, with cascading consequences for the paranoid-schizoid and depressive positions.

Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Identification then leads to the formation of a secondary character, the individual identifying with his best developed function to such an extent that he alienates himself very largely or even entirely from his original character

Jung describes a process of function-identification that, while terminologically distinct from introjective identification, addresses the same dynamic of self-alienation through incorporative assimilation of an external or partial-self object.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

By the time the stage of Figure 10 is reached both analyst and patient have progressed beyond the paranoid-schizoid tendency to split the image of the other into ‘all-wounded’ and ‘all-healing’. Neither participant is splitting himself; so, therefore, there is a whole object basis to the analysis.

Samuels, in a Jungian-Kleinian synthesis, implies that the movement toward whole-object relating requires the resolution of both projective and introjective splitting, pointing obliquely to the normative role of introjective identification in analytic progress.

Samuels, Andrew, Jung and the Post-Jungians, 1985aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms