Across the depth-psychology corpus, ‘interruption’ functions not as a mere pause but as a structurally generative rupture — a break in the continuity of narrative, bodily life, or temporal project that forces a reckoning with contingency. Arthur Frank’s illness-narrative scholarship furnishes the richest sustained treatment: for Frank, illness is paradigmatically an interruption of the life-story, and the ill person’s task is not simply to restore the broken sequence but to discover what kind of story can incorporate ongoing disruption as its very substance. Nancy Mairs becomes an exemplary figure whose fractured prose enacts the condition it describes — the interrupted story is itself the story. Nussbaum, reading Lucretius, locates interruption at the existential horizon: death interrupts not isolated acts but the whole project of living a human life, severing the temporally extended patterns — marriage, friendship, citizenship — in which human value inheres. Han, from a critical-theoretical vantage, recasts interruption as a positive political and contemplative resource: only the ‘negativity of an interruption’ permits a genuine turn toward the Other, arresting the hyperactive dispersion of the burnout subject. Auerbach’s literary-critical deployment remains structural and narratological, analyzing how Homeric digression suspends crisis to externalize context. The ACA recovery literature treats interruption defensively, as a violation of the protected speech-space. Together these positions reveal a productive tension: interruption as wound, as narrative truth, as existential loss, and as necessary condition for reflection.