Interoceptive processing designates the complex neural and computational operations by which the nervous system senses, interprets, and integrates signals arising from within the body — a domain that the depth-psychology corpus treats not merely as peripheral physiology but as the foundational substrate of emotion, self, motivation, and psychopathology. Craig’s neurobiological program establishes that interoception constitutes a morphologically distinct sensory system, tracing small-diameter afferent fibers through lamina I neurons to a dedicated interoceptive cortex, and situating subjective feelings as cortical representations of homeostatic state. Barrett extends this architecture into a predictive-coding framework: the interoceptive network issues continuous predictions about bodily state, tests these against sensory input, and generates affective experience from the resulting prediction error. Paulus and colleagues radicalize this framework for addiction science, arguing that dysregulated insular function produces a pathological body prediction error — the mismatch between anticipated and actual interoceptive state — that drives craving, impaired decision-making, and allostatic collapse. Khalsa’s roadmap broadens the terrain further, positioning hierarchical Bayesian inference as the unifying computational principle linking interoception to homeostatic regulation, psychosomatic phenomena, and a taxonomy of psychiatric disorders. Across these positions, the insula emerges as the central neuroanatomical locus, while measurement validity, clinical translation, and the precise architecture of top-down versus bottom-up contributions remain actively contested.