Internalized Other

The internalized other designates the psychic residue of significant relational encounters — a representation of the external person that has been absorbed into the self’s architecture and thereafter operates as an autonomous inner agency. Across the depth-psychology corpus, the term circulates through several partially overlapping theoretical vocabularies. In Kleinian object-relations theory, the concept is virtually foundational: the infant’s earliest oscillations between introjection and projection install part-objects and whole objects as interior presences that populate the superego and ego alike, generating persecutory and reparative dynamics that endure into adult life. Schore’s neurobiological synthesis translates this into sensorimotor representations of self-and-other-in-interaction, demonstrating that early internalized object relations are encoded at subcortical levels and function as unconscious templates for affect regulation. The shame-theoretic tradition — represented by Cairns, Williams, and Konstan — draws on the concept to explain how the imagined or ‘fantasized audience’ constitutes an internalized, ‘generalized other’ whose implied judgement can trigger shame in the complete absence of real observers. Ricoeur approaches the internalized other through the generational model of conscience, where ancestral voices sediment into a receptive self-structure. The Adult Children literature instantiates the concept clinically as the ‘critical inner voice,’ the verbatim echo of a parent installed within. What is at stake across all these treatments is the same fundamental question: in what sense does the other persist inside the self, and with what formative or deforming consequences?

In the library 16 passages

These sensorimotor models are equivalent to early-forming internalized object relations, unconscious representations of the self interacting with the social environment whose function is the cornerstone of modern psychoanalytic conceptions of the mind.

Schore argues that the earliest sensorimotor templates of self-and-other constitute internalized object relations proper, anchoring the concept neurobiologically as the bedrock of psychic structure.

Schore, Allan N., Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self: The Neurobiology of Emotional Development, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

We began this chapter talking about how we have internalized our parents’ behavior. Anyone who might doubt that he or she has internalized a parent’s behavior only needs to listen to the internal critic.

The ACA text operationalizes the internalized other as the ‘critical inner voice’ — a direct introjection of parental behavior that drives self-doubt and reactive functioning.

INC , ACA WSO, ADULT CHILDREN OF ALCOHOLICS DYSFUNCTIONAL FAMILIES, 2012thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

if the self were not constituted primordially as a receptive structure for the sedimentation of the superego, the internalization of ancestral voices would be unthinkable, and the ego, as a primitive agency, could not even perform the function of mediator

Ricoeur frames the internalized other in terms of the self’s primordial receptivity to injunction, without which the Freudian structure of superego, ego, and id becomes incoherent.

Ricoeur, Paul, Oneself as Another, 1992thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

‘The dialogic nature of inner speech assumes two intra-psychic representations in an intimate involvement, which may eventually come to be so habitual that it is only experienced as syntonic self direction, not as recognizable inner conversation’

Schore cites Wilson and Weinstein to show that the internalized other eventually loses its dialogic character and is assimilated as seamless self-direction, masking its relational origin.

Schore, Allan N., Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self: The Neurobiology of Emotional Development, 1994supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

To overlook the importance of the imagined other is what I just called the silly mistake. The second and more interesting mistake concerns the identity, and the attitudes, of the other whose gaze is in question.

Williams insists that the imagined — hence internalized — other is indispensable to shame theory, and that what matters critically is not merely its presence but the specific perspective it is imagined to hold.

Bernard Williams, Shame and Necessity, 1993supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Attachment to external bad objects is the result of the repetition compulsion and it is extremely difficult to release bad objects in the external world until internalized object- and self-representations are worked through or altered.

Flores demonstrates the clinical intractability of the internalized bad object, arguing that external relational patterns cannot change until the corresponding internal representations are therapeutically transformed.

Flores, Philip J, Group Psychotherapy with Addicted Populations An, 1997supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Less distortion occurs in interactions with others since the internalized object- and self-representations are integrated

Flores ties the degree of distortion in actual interpersonal encounters directly to the integration or fragmentation of internalized object- and self-representations.

Flores, Philip J, Group Psychotherapy with Addicted Populations An, 1997supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

by introjecting the object, first of all the breast, relations to internal objects are established

Klein locates the founding mechanism of the internalized other in the infant’s introjection of the breast, making internal object-relations the earliest form of psychic structure.

Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

he had been haunted by a feeling of some inner presence which, in some way which he could not have described, was ever beyond the reach of his own consciousness

Klein reads a literary character’s relationship to a paternal object-surrogate as evidence of an internalized other that operates as a felt inner presence below the threshold of conscious articulation.

Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

he responds to something which he himself has put into them. Externalizations are the more difficult to recognize since they are often mixed up with his reactions to others on the grounds of his needs

Horney describes the complementary mechanism of externalization, wherein the internalized other is projected outward and then responded to as though it were a quality of the external person.

Horney, Karen, Neurosis and Human Growth: The Struggle Toward Self-Realization, 1950aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the anxiety relating to attacks by internalized objects — first of all part-objects — is in my view the basis of hypochondriasis

Klein draws a direct clinical line from the persecutory action of internalized objects to the somatic anxieties characteristic of hypochondria.

Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963, 1957aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms