Inner Vision occupies a distinctive register within the depth-psychological corpus, designating a mode of apprehension that is neither ordinary sensory perception nor discursive ratiocination, but an activated faculty of the psyche capable of encountering suprasensory realities with the same—or greater—immediacy than the outer eye encounters physical objects. The term gathers several partially overlapping traditions. In Govinda’s Tibetan Buddhist framework, inner vision is identified with the pratyaveksana-jnana, the ‘Wisdom of Discriminating Clear Vision,’ a spontaneous, intuitive mode of knowing that transcends conceptual analysis. For Corbin, working through Sufi and Sohravardian sources, inner vision is authenticated phenomenologically by its correspondence with an inward state—the ‘organ of inner sight’ perceiving suprasensory realities that are no less real for being non-physical. Plotinus anchors the lineage philosophically: the One cannot be known by audition but only by vision, a vision in which seer and seen become indistinct. Jung approaches the same territory empirically, documenting visionary eruptions from the unconscious—in Brother Klaus and in active imagination—as irruptions of archetypal content through which the unconscious corrects or expands conscious orientation. Johnson domesticates the concept for therapeutic practice, describing the ‘unitive vision’ as a rare but transformative breakthrough of wholeness. The central tension in the corpus is epistemological: whether inner vision is a subjective construction, a genuine perception of a supersensory order, or, in Corbin’s theophanic reading, the very medium through which the Divine knows itself.