The depth-psychology corpus engages ‘Initiatory Technology’ not as a single doctrine but as a constellation of practices, symbols, and ritual procedures whose function is the deliberate transformation of consciousness through enacted death and rebirth. Eliade remains the paramount voice, treating initiatory technology as the systematic ritual engineering of ontological change: burial, dismemberment, swallowing by monsters, regression to the embryonic, and re-emergence as cosmogony. For Eliade, these procedures are not mere theater but replicate the structure of creation itself, restoring the candidate to the ‘blank page’ of primordial being. Moore and Bly extend the problematic into contemporary masculine psychology, arguing that the collapse of formal initiatory process produces identity pathology — men blocked from mature archetypal energies precisely because no transformative technology was operative in their formation. Corbin introduces a parallel axis, mapping initiatory technology onto the esoteric brotherhoods of Islam and Christianity as the inner, gnosis-bearing dimension that official religion systematically suppresses. Campbell frames the same technology in terms of Oedipal dramaturgy — the ritual procedures encode the generational transmission of sacred knowledge. Across these voices a central tension persists: whether initiatory technology operates through cosmological participation (Eliade), psychological individuation (Moore), or hermeneutic transmission (Corbin). The stakes are anthropological as much as clinical: wherever formal initiatory procedures are absent, pathology — individual or collective — rushes in to fill the vacuum.