Imago

The term ‘Imago’ carries at least three distinct registers across the depth-psychology corpus, and the scholarly reader must navigate their tensions with care. In its most technically Jungian deployment—exemplified in Murray Stein’s extended meditations on adult transformation—the imago designates the emergent psychic form that a personality achieves through metamorphosis: not a fixed portrait but a living structural pattern, analogous to the butterfly’s final instar, that crystallizes from the pressure of transformative experience, intimate relationship, and archetypal necessity. Here the imago is ontogenetic, teleological, and deeply impersonal even as it is uniquely individual. A second register, traceable to Jung’s early analytic writings and to Freudian inheritance, treats imago as a parental introject—specifically the father-imago or mother-imago—lodged in the unconscious as a regressive attractor that distorts perception of real persons through projection. This psychoanalytic usage frames the imago as obstacle rather than telos. A third, more recent deployment appears in relational and somatic therapies (Hendrix’s Imago dialogue, Winhall’s felt-sense integration), where the term is appropriated to name the relational template shaping partner selection and interpersonal safety. Alongside these clinical registers, Corbin’s Neoplatonic trajectory—Imago set in juxtaposition with Magia—introduces a cosmological dimension in which the image is the very medium of creative divine action. These strands rarely speak to one another directly; the concordance reveals how one term can bear simultaneously developmental, projective, relational, and theophanic weight.

In the library

They engage these synchronicities creatively, and through this interaction they transform themselves and constellate their adult psychological imagos… Nor do they choose the final form of the imago.

Stein establishes that the adult imago is constellated through lived synchronicity and transformative crisis rather than conscious intention, aligning its formation with the involuntary logic of metamorphosis.

Stein, Murray, Transformation Emergence of the Self (Volume 7) (Carolyn, 1998thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

If we look at imago formation—the emergence of the self in adulthood—we find that Picasso, like Rembrandt, achieved a full metamorphosis, but the kind of imago he became is very different.

Stein applies imago formation as an analytic category to compare two artists, showing that the archetype of the creative artist admits radically different individual expressions of the same underlying structure.

Stein, Murray, Transformation Emergence of the Self (Volume 7) (Carolyn, 1998thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

so close do both now approximate their common imago… Communities of nuns who live together for years under the spiritual presence and direction of a powerful founder unite through an imago that unites their personalities through unconscious mergers and identifications.

Stein extends the imago concept from the individual to the collective, arguing that shared transformative living constellates a communal imago binding groups through unconscious identification.

Stein, Murray, Transformation Emergence of the Self (Volume 7) (Carolyn, 1998thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Jung girls, at the time of their first love, have great difficulty in expressing themselves owing to disturbances brought about by regressive reactivation of the father-imago.

Jung’s early psychoanalytic usage treats the imago as an unconscious parental introject whose regressive reactivation disrupts present relational experience, establishing the projective-complex dimension of the term.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Symbols of Transformation, 1952thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Picasso put his developing imago in terms of mythic images, which have the capacity to combine physical presence with a strong statement of archetypal transcendence.

Stein shows that the developing imago requires mythic imagery as its vehicle, because only archetypal forms can hold the tension between concrete particularity and transpersonal depth.

Stein, Murray, Transformation Emergence of the Self (Volume 7) (Carolyn, 1998supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

While I cannot possibly offer a complete account of the development of Picasso’s full adult imago, I will generalize that the main problem was… how to combine the opposites he discovered within himself into a unified, if highly complex, image.

Stein frames imago formation as the developmental problem of integrating inner opposites into a coherent, if complex, psychic form.

Stein, Murray, Transformation Emergence of the Self (Volume 7) (Carolyn, 1998supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Picasso’s Minotaur pictures can, I believe, be read as the emergence of his adult imago. His most concentrated expression of the Minotaur image came about in 1933-34.

Stein reads Picasso’s mythological self-symbolism as the pictorial record of adult imago formation, linking the biographical and the archetypal.

Stein, Murray, Transformation Emergence of the Self (Volume 7) (Carolyn, 1998supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the world as Magia divina ‘imagined’ by the Godhead, that is the ancient doctrine, typified in the juxtaposition of the words Imago and Magia, which Novalis rediscovered through Fichte.

Corbin invokes the etymological and cosmological pairing of Imago and Magia to argue that creative imagination is not a human faculty but a divine generative act through which the world is brought into being.

Corbin, Henry, Alone with the Alone: Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn Arabi, 1969supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the ancient doctrine, typified in the juxtaposition of the words Imago and Magia, which Novalis rediscovered through Fichte.

Corbin locates the Imago within the Neoplatonic-Romantic lineage as the vehicle of magical-creative action, insisting on its distinction from mere fantasy.

Corbin, Henry, Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn Arabi, 1969supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

people are formed into images and age progressively into their images… character and image are inseparable.

Hillman, though not using the term imago explicitly, articulates the closely related thesis that the psyche’s deepest identity is imaginal, with character constituted by and progressively disclosed through image.

Hillman, James, The Force of Character: And the Lasting Life, 1999supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Ruland says, ‘Imagination is the star in man, the celestial or supercelestial body.’ This astounding definition throws a quite special light on the fantasy processes.

Jung’s citation of Ruland associates the alchemical imaginatio with a celestial body within the human being, providing an archaic cosmological analogue to the imago as inner formative principle.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychology and Alchemy, 1944aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms