Image Bearer

The Seba library treats Image Bearer in 8 passages, across 5 authors (including Jung, Emma, Jung, Carl Gustav, Edinger, Edward F.).

In the library

the image-bearer often becomes all too obvious. An archetype, such as the animus represents, will never really coincide with an individual man, the less so the more individual that man is.

Emma Jung argues that the image-bearer is the human figure onto whom the archetypal image is projected, and that the inevitable non-coincidence of archetype and individual person is the source of relational crisis and disillusionment.

Jung, Emma, Animus and Anima, 1957thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

For a man, a woman is best fitted to be the real bearer of his soul-image. This person is the object of intense love or equally intense hate (or fear).

Jung identifies the soul-image bearer as the person onto whom the projected anima or animus is transferred, making them the site of overwhelming affect precisely because the projection forecloses objective relationship.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Other pairs of opposites that gather around the cross include the lance-bearer and the sponge-bearer and even the sun

Edinger extends the image-bearer concept into Christian iconography, showing that ritual and symbolic figures flanking the crucified Christ function as bearers of archetypal opposites within the Self's total symbol.

Edinger, Edward F., The Christian Archetype: A Jungian Commentary on the Life of Christ, 1987supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The image that a mentor spots in a pupil or apprentice is neither plain about a face, or simple about a surface.

Hillman argues that the image borne by a person is phenomenally present in gesture, style, and expression — the bearer's visible surface is itself the disclosure of the soul's code.

Hillman, James, The Soul's Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The Christian God-image cannot become incarnate in empirical man without contradictions — quite apart from the fact that man with all his external characteristics seems little suited to representing a god.

Jung frames the incarnation paradox as the structural impossibility of any finite human bearer fully containing an infinite divine image, a tension that defines the God-image bearer's necessary inadequacy.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, 1963supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The daimon remembers what is in your image and belongs to your pattern, and therefore your daimon is the carrier of your destiny.

Hillman reframes the image-bearer as the individual soul itself, which carries a pre-natal image as its destining pattern — inverting the Jungian projection model so that the bearer owns, rather than receives, the image.

Hillman, James, The Soul's Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

when the goddess ritually unites herself with every fertility king, with father, son, and grandchild, or with each of her archpriests, these are always one and the same for her, because for her sexual Jungian means only one thing, no matter who the bearer of the phallus may be

Neumann illustrates how the Great Mother archetype treats successive human bearers of the masculine image as interchangeable, underscoring the archetype's indifference to individual identity in early stages of consciousness.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

he was transferring all that heavy weight of need to his personal relationship with his new wife... Few relationships can endure such an archetypal burden.

Edinger illustrates the psychological devastation wrought when an individual is made the sole bearer of a lost God-image, demonstrating the clinical stakes of unwithdawn projection.

Edinger, Edward F., The Mysterium Lectures: A Journey Through C.G. Jung's Mysterium Coniunctionis, 1995aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →