Humility occupies a position of singular centrality across the depth-psychology corpus, appearing not as a peripheral virtue but as the very hinge upon which self-knowledge, spiritual transformation, and psychological integration turn. The corpus presents at least three distinct registers in which humility operates. In the ascetic and contemplative traditions — represented by John Climacus, the Philokalic Fathers, and Evagrius of Pontus — humility is the summit virtue, the ‘heavenly waterspout’ that lifts the soul from the abyss, achievable only through radical self-dispossession and the recognition of one’s creatureliness. In the recovery literature — Kurtz, the ACA materials, McCabe on Jung and A.A. — humility is recast in psychological and relational terms: the willingness to accept imperfection, to relinquish comparison, and to align one’s will with a power beyond the ego. A third register, represented by the Taoist I Ching, reads humility as a cosmic and strategic principle, the emptying of the mind that permits genuine fullness. A consistent tension runs through all three registers: the distinction between authentic, inward humility and its counterfeits — performed self-abasement, humiliation mistaken for virtue, or ‘trumpeted humility’ that reproduces pride in diminished form. Von Franz adds a psychoanalytic depth: genuine humility may begin not in virtue at all but in the unmastered inadequacy of inferior feeling, suffered rather than cultivated.