The Homeric Hymns occupy a significant, if unevenly distributed, position within the depth-psychology corpus. Their principal importance lies in the domain of archetypal narrative: as pre-philosophical hymnic poetry addressed to individual Olympian figures, they furnish the mythological raw material upon which Jungian, Kerényian, and post-Jungian thinkers draw when theorizing the autonomous gods as psychic powers. Kerényi engages the Hymn to Hermes with sustained attention, reading it as a disclosure of the Hermetic essence; Walter F. Otto mines the hymnic corpus for evidence of the Greeks’ unmediated encounter with divine presences. Sullivan conducts systematic philological analysis of psychic terminology—thumos, noos, kradie, ker—across Homer, Hesiod, and the Homeric Hymns alike, treating the hymns as continuous with the Homeric psychological lexicon. Nagy approaches the hymns through the lens of oral-formulaic tradition, arguing that no recoverable author stands behind them. The pivotal biographical node is Hillman’s encounter with Charles Boer’s 1971 translation, nominated for a National Book Award, which directly shaped the archetypal psychology project at Spring Publications. Benveniste’s linguistic analysis of hosiē in the hymns adds a further, anthropological layer. The corpus thus treats the Hymns simultaneously as primary mythological source, linguistic archive, and catalyst for modern depth-psychological creativity.