Hesiodic Cosmology occupies a distinctive position in the depth-psychology corpus as a site where archaic Greek myth, genealogical theology, and moral anthropology converge. The corpus treats it not as mere antiquarian poetry but as a structural blueprint for understanding how the Greeks organized time, value, and human fate within a divinely ordered cosmos. Jean-Pierre Vernant provides the most sustained analytical engagement, reading the Five Ages (Works and Days) as a non-linear, cyclical system of hierarchical values rather than a narrative of simple decline — a thesis that directly challenges the commonsense reading of Hesiodic history as progressive deterioration. Gregory Nagy situates Hesiodic poetry within a complementary Panhellenic unity alongside Homer, arguing that the Works and Days narratively compresses what the Iliad expands, establishing Hesiod as co-architect of Greek cultural consciousness. Richard Seaford traces the cosmogonic succession narrative of the Theogony to Near Eastern parallels, foregrounding its political logic of sovereignty and the redistribution of honors. The Contest of Homer and Hesiod, embedded in the primary Hesiodic texts themselves, raises questions about the social function of cosmological poetry as contest, canon, and civic pedagogy. Across these positions, a key tension emerges between synchronic structural readings of Hesiodic myth and diachronic, historicizing ones — a tension that proves generative for depth-psychological interpretation of time, race, and divine order.