Within the depth-psychology corpus, Heraclitus occupies a singular position as the pre-Socratic thinker whose doctrines most directly anticipate the structural concerns of analytical psychology. The corpus reveals a figure simultaneously claimed by multiple traditions: Jung enlisted him as a philosophical ancestor, calling him one of the ten pillars of ‘the bridge of the spirit which spans the morass of human history’ and identifying with his reputation for darkness and obscurity. Edinger’s detailed exegesis in The Psyche in Antiquity treats Heraclitean fire (pyr aeizoon), the logos, and the unity of opposites as prototypes for the Self and the transcendent function. Sullivan’s philological reconstruction recovers the precision with which Heraclitus deployed noos, logos, and psyche, demonstrating that his cosmic principle of strife-as-justice prefigures depth psychology’s engagement with tension and enantiodromia. McGilchrist reads the surviving fragments through a neurological lens, arguing their taciturn, paradoxical quality reflects right-hemisphere epistemology. The Fragments themselves — as a primary source within the library — present Heraclitus’s cosmology of fire, wisdom as the oneness of mind, and a poetics of dissonance. Tensions in the corpus cluster around whether Heraclitus is best read as cosmologist, proto-psychologist, or wisdom poet, and whether his ‘darkness’ is an epistemological virtue or an obstacle to transmission.