The figure of the Guide occupies a structurally indispensable position throughout the depth-psychology corpus, appearing simultaneously as psychic function, mythological archetype, relational role, and metaphysical principle. From Corbin’s meticulous exegesis of the ‘Man of Light and His Guide’ in Iranian Sufism — where the Guide manifests as Perfect Nature, the sage’s personal angel of light — to Keréнyi’s treatment of Hermes as psychopomp and guide of souls, the tradition consistently figures guidance as something irreducibly individualized: a luminous counterpart unique to each soul, not a collective transmission. Jung’s own anima-as-guide passages in ‘The Practice of Psychotherapy’ elaborate this into clinical phenomenology, where the interior feminine functions as spiritual directrix, ‘knows the way he should go.’ Tozzi, drawing on Dante’s Virgil and Jung’s Philemon, translates the archetype into therapeutic necessity: the inner world demands an escort as urgently as any unknown external terrain. Edinger complicates any naïve naturalism by insisting the unconscious is not itself a guide but raw material requiring conscious correction — the ego must construct the compass. Hillman redirects the guiding function from transcendent figure to daimonic calling, the soul’s own acorn pressing toward destiny. Across these positions runs a shared axiom: the unguided journey through interior space is perilous, and the guide — whether angelic, archetypal, therapeutic, or mythological — is the condition of possibility for meaningful psychological traversal.