Greek Religion, as treated across the depth-psychology corpus, is not a unified object of historical description but a contested site where questions of symbolic meaning, psychological structure, ritual function, and civilizational value converge. The canonical scholarly voice is Burkert’s, whose Archaic and Classical synthesis situates Greek religion within Bronze Age Near Eastern networks, Indo-European prehistory, and polis social organization, resisting any isolation of Hellenic piety as uniquely splendid. Against this philological sobriety stands Walter F. Otto’s phenomenological insistence that Greek religion deserves encounter on its own terms, not measured by the gauge of Christianity or Asian religions. Jane Ellen Harrison anchors Greek religion in social origins, pre-Olympian chthonic strata, and the Durkheimian ritual substrate beneath myth. Rohde reads it as a natural growth without dogma, its inward meaning expressed through performance rather than scripture. Dodds presses into its irrational dimensions — ecstasy, shamanism, inherited guilt, and the psychological costs of the Olympian rationalization. For Jung, the Apollinian-Dionysian opposition within Greek religion furnishes a paradigm of psychic compensation. Vernant reads it structurally, attending to categories of the sacred, image, and memory. What unites these divergent approaches is a shared conviction that Greek religion functions as a primary archive of human psychological and cultural possibility.