The Greek middle voice occupies a distinctive and productive place within the depth-psychology corpus, primarily through Rutger Allan’s sustained linguistic analysis, which treats it as a polysemous network category rather than a simple grammatical opposition. Allan’s monograph demonstrates that the middle voice in Ancient Greek encodes a fundamental semantic principle — subject-affectedness — whereby the grammatical subject functions simultaneously as both Initiator and Endpoint of the event. This characterization, indebted to Kemmer’s typological work and Langacker’s cognitive grammar, organizes a diverse range of usage types — from passive and spontaneous process middles to reciprocal, mental process, body motion, and indirect reflexive middles — into a coherent semantic map. The central tension in the corpus lies between reductive accounts (valence reduction, simple reflexivity) and the network-polysemy model Allan defends, which resists collapsing the middle’s meanings into a single scalar dimension. A secondary tension concerns the historical expansion of the passive aorist at the expense of the sigmatic middle aorist, tracing morphological change through the semantic network’s connected regions. Peterson’s adjacent work on the ‘abolished middle’ gestures toward a broader cultural-psychological resonance of the grammatical category, suggesting that the soul’s tripartite structure was itself implicated in debates over middle-voice ontology. The term thus bridges technical linguistics and depth-psychological reflection on agency, interiority, and the dissolution of subject-object duality.