Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Great’ functions less as a simple intensifier than as a charged qualifier marking a qualitative threshold—the point at which magnitude, nobility, and orientation of will converge into something cosmologically or psychologically decisive. The I Ching traditions (Ritsema/Karcher, Wilhelm, Huang, Wang Bi) are the most systematic: TA (大) is formally defined as that which imposes direction, enables leadership, and stands in polar tension with HSIAO (small), the principle of flexible adaptation. This pairing generates much of the hexagram system’s moral psychology. In the Taoist register (Zhuangzi), ‘Great’ proliferates into compound ideals—Great Unity, Great Yin, Great Serenity, Great Man, Great Clod—each naming a mode of perfected, boundaryless awareness that transcends conventional categories. The Tibetan Buddhist usage (Evans-Wentz, Govinda) makes ‘Great’ an epithet of fundamental metaphysical structures: the Great Path, the Great Light, the immutable ground of Clear Wisdom. In Gnostic sources (Meyer), ‘Great’ is an honorific of the divine hierarchy—Great Seth, Great Mother, Great Luminaries—marking ontological rank within the pleroma. Neumann’s Jungian framework preserves the archetypal sense, invoking Great Mother and Great Individual as poles of psychological development. Across traditions, the term anchors a discourse of the superlative-as-normative: what is ‘great’ sets the standard against which ordinary orientation must be measured.