Fury occupies a distinctive position in the depth-psychology corpus as both a phenomenological state and a mythologically charged force. The passages gathered here reveal a spectrum of interpretive approaches: classical philology traces the concept through Greek terms such as lyssa (martial rage, frenzy, rabies) and menos, locating fury in the very breath and viscera of the warrior; mythographic scholarship identifies fury with divine agency — Ares as ‘that thing of fury, evil-wrought’ in the Iliad, or the Germanic Wotan as chief of those ‘possessed by fury’; alchemical psychology, as read through Jung, perceives fury and wrath as the very medium within which the Tincture of Life is concealed — ‘love in this fury and wrath.’ Depth psychology thus refuses to reduce fury to mere pathology. Williams’s reading of Agamemnon introduces the crucial distinction between deciding to act and wanting to act in a murderous state of mind, a distinction that resonates with Jung’s understanding of possession by autonomous affect. Across these traditions — Homeric, alchemical, tragic, Germanic — fury appears not as simple passion but as a liminal condition in which ordinary ego-consciousness yields to transpersonal or daemonic energies, making it a central index of what depth psychology means by possession, inflation, and the eruptive unconscious.