Frustration Tolerance

The Seba library treats Frustration Tolerance in 7 passages, across 5 authors (including Bion, Wilfred Ruprecht, Schore, Allan N., Dayton, Tian).

In the library

The choice that matters to the psycho-analyst is one that lies between procedures designed to evade frustration and those designed to modify it.

Bion posits frustration tolerance as the central clinical axis, arguing that primary or secondary intolerance of frustration determines whether analytic treatment can address root personality factors or only secondary ones.

Bion, Wilfred Ruprecht, Learning from Experience, 1962thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Tolerance of frustration (Van Leishout, 1975) are considered to be functional derivatives of the ability to regulate emotional experience and expression.

Schore grounds frustration tolerance neurobiologically and developmentally, identifying it as an emergent capacity derived from emotional self-regulation that consolidates during the practicing subphase of early childhood.

Schore, Allan N., Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self: The Neurobiology of Emotional Development, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Low frustration tolerance and an inability to live in the present are hallmarks of addiction and self-medication.

Dayton frames low frustration tolerance as a defining psychodynamic signature of addiction, linking it directly to the failure to delay gratification and to the collapse of temporal self-organization.

Dayton, Tian, Emotional Sobriety: From Relationship Trauma to Resilience and Lasting Fulfillment, 2007thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Ego functioning, reality-testing, secondary thought process, and frustration tolerance leave a child with less reliance on external objects and the toddler begins to develop more self-reliance and autonomy.

Flores traces the developmental emergence of frustration tolerance through Mahler's practicing subphase, embedding it within the broader sequence of ego maturation and separation-individuation.

Flores, Philip J, Group Psychotherapy with Addicted Populations An, 1997supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Frustration optimal, 227, 230, 433, 443, 471. See also Object-relations theory tolerance for, 225, 594

Flores indexes frustration tolerance as a canonical concept within object-relations theory, cross-referenced with optimal frustration and the therapeutic goals of addicted populations' group treatment.

Flores, Philip J, Group Psychotherapy with Addicted Populations An, 1997supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Just as I learned on retreat that my progress in meditation depended on my ability to bear disappointment, so too we discover that happiness in a relationship depends on the same capacity.

Epstein, drawing on Winnicott and Buddhist practice, reframes frustration tolerance as the shared foundation of both meditative development and relational intimacy.

Epstein, Mark, Going to Pieces Without Falling Apart: A Buddhist Perspective on Wholeness, 1998supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Through identification with the mother, her regulatory interventions and the attitudes governing them are internalized and become part of the child's own regulatory functions.

Schore describes the internalization of maternal regulation as the precondition for the child's developing self-regulatory capacity, providing the developmental substrate from which frustration tolerance emerges.

Schore, Allan N., Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self: The Neurobiology of Emotional Development, 1994aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →