Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘frenzied’ occupies a contested threshold between pathology and sacred possession, between clinical symptom and religious phenomenon. The term’s most sustained treatment appears in the classical-religion scholarship of Walter F. Otto, Erwin Rohde, Walter Burkert, and E. R. Dodds, who locate frenzy at the very heart of Dionysiac cult: the ‘frenzied’ Dionysus and his maenad attendants are not aberrant but constitutive figures whose madness discloses the god’s essential nature. Rohde carefully distinguishes ‘divine mania’ from bodily disease, arguing that Greek physicians and philosophers alike acknowledged its experiential reality, while Dodds traces the infectious, compulsive quality of ecstatic dancing madness across centuries. Against this religious-anthropological axis, Burkert reads the frenzied madness of cult participants ambivalently—as potentially punitive, potentially revelatory, ultimately requiring containment by an armed male authority. Bleuler’s clinical perspective imports the term into psychiatric nosography, describing the ‘wildest outbreaks’ of catatonic excitement as a formal category of schizophrenic excitation. The tension animating this cluster of uses is irreducible: is frenzy a breakthrough of the sacred or a breakdown of ego-structure? The depth-psychological tradition refuses to resolve this opposition cleanly, insisting instead that the frenzied state discloses something true about psychic reality that ordered consciousness cannot access.