Fortuna occupies a distinctive position in the depth-psychology corpus: she is neither a marginal mythological curiosity nor a mere allegory of chance, but a persistent archetypal presence through which thinkers from von Franz to Hillman, Greene to Place, interrogate the relationship between psyche and fate. The corpus treats her along two principal axes. The first is cosmological-theological: as a synthesis of Tyche, Nemesis, and Necessity, Fortuna crystallizes the ancient problem of whether events befall the soul from without or arise from within — the wheel being her supreme emblem of blind, cyclical compulsion. The second is psychological: her wheel functions as a mirror for consciousness, exposing the ego’s fantasy of control and inviting reflection on the rhythm of ascent and descent that governs both outer circumstance and inner transformation. Von Franz situates her among numinous time-gods — alongside Kairos and Nike — as that ‘blind force which in the course of time carries some people upward to luck and success.’ Hillman, reading the Renaissance, sees her wheel as the containing image for the soul’s inherent polyvalence, its capacity to hold multiple directions simultaneously. Greene, working through the astrological tradition, links Fortuna’s ‘bad house’ (Mala Fortuna) to fate’s pathological dimension. The Tarot commentators — Place, Nichols, Pollack, Jodorowsky — transform her into a card-image confronting the self with alternation, inevitability, and the necessity of surrender. Together these voices articulate Fortuna not as determinism but as a call to a more conscious relation to the uncontrollable.