Within the depth-psychology corpus, the Forge functions as one of the most psychologically saturated images in the mythological archive, condensing into a single site the themes of wounding, creative transformation, fire, and the generation of symbolic objects from raw matter. The figure of Hephaistos — divine smith, the lame artificer cast from Olympus — stands at the center of this symbolic field: his forge is simultaneously a place of exile, of compensation, and of extraordinary making. Marie-Louise von Franz establishes the decisive genealogical claim: the art of the smith at the forge and that of the alchemist were originally considered identical traditions, a conjunction the Book of Enoch preserves in its account of fallen angels transmitting metallurgical knowledge to humanity. This identification between forge-work and alchemical opus is not ornamental; it grounds the depth-psychological reading of fire, matter, and transformation in a single archaic lineage. Mircea Eliade’s The Forge and the Crucible is the canonical scholarly anchor for this convergence, cited by von Franz and indexed prominently in her Creation Myths. Eliade’s study legitimizes the forge as a locus of initiatory and cosmological significance. James Hillman’s alchemical psychology supplies the complementary register: the alchemist as artist of fire who must work upon himself even as he works upon matter. Clarissa Pinkola Estés extends the symbolic field to Hephaistos’s silver prostheses — artifacts of compensation — while Rafael López-Pedraza reads Velázquez’s Vulcan’s Forge as an epiphany of the archetypal smith within the ordinary world. The forge thus occupies a critical junction between wound and creation, between disfigurement and mastery, making it indispensable to any depth-psychological account of the creative instinct.