Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘fight’ emerges as a concept operating simultaneously on biological, mythological, and relational registers. At the somatic level—most systematically in Ogden, Levine, and Heller—fight constitutes one terminus of the autonomic defensive cascade (fight/flight/freeze), triggered when flight is foreclosed and aggression offers the last viable path to survival; its somatic signatures—tension in hands and arms, curling fists—are read as truncated action tendencies whose incompletion becomes the substrate of trauma. Neumann elevates the same dynamic to cosmological myth: the dragon fight is the archetypal template of ego-consciousness wresting itself from the uroboric matrix, and its success or failure determines whether individuation proceeds or collapses back into inflation or world-denial. Estés appropriates the motif for feminine psychology, insisting that the psyche must periodically fight to retain its deep knowing against predatory forces both inner and outer. Bly, drawing on Jung, relocates fight within relational life, arguing that the suppression of conscious fighting in intimate partnerships constitutes a psychological impoverishment rather than a virtue. The Homeric and Hesiodic texts supply the cultural substrate against which all these readings operate—fight as agonistic display, as martial honor, as cosmic spectacle. The central tension across the corpus is whether fight is a primitive residue to be metabolized into consciousness, or an irreplaceable expression of vital selfhood that pathology and culture alike conspire to extinguish.