The depth-psychology corpus treats Festival not as mere celebration but as a structured temporal rupture — a sanctioned suspension of ordinary duration through which the sacred irrupts into profane life. Eliade provides the foundational theoretical framework: the festival is the reactualization of primordial mythical time, rendering sacred time ontologically reversible and indefinitely repeatable. Burkert, by contrast, approaches the festival through the lens of sacrificial anthropology, arguing that the festival calendar is the living skeleton of Greek religious life, articulating everyday existence through alternating cycles of dissolution and renewal, order and its deliberate transgression. Harrison and Kerenyi extend this into the social-psychological register, reading festivals such as the Ennaeteric rites at Delphi and the Dionysian Anthesteria as dramatic enactments of the Eniautos-daimon cycle — the death and regeneration of the year-spirit. Otto grounds the festival in the epiphany of the god himself: the Dionysiac festival is not commemorative but participatory, the god genuinely arriving among the celebrants. Tensions persist between these positions: whether the festival’s primary function is cosmological (Eliade), socio-political (Burkert), psychic (Otto, Harrison), or eschatological (Rohde). The festival thus occupies a central position as the ritual site where time, community, sacrifice, ecstasy, and myth converge.